From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/25] arm64: Fix HCR.TGE status for NMI contexts Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 21:39:24 +0000 Message-ID: <20181212213925.BFE1020839@mail.kernel.org> References: <1544633245-6036-2-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0487969178506171221==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1544633245-6036-2-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Sasha Levin , Julien Thierry , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, daniel.thompson@linaro.org, Arnd Bergmann , Marc Zyngier , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, James Morse List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org --===============0487969178506171221== Content-Type: text/plain Hi, [This is an automated email] This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag. The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all The bot has tested the following trees: v4.19.8, v4.14.87, v4.9.144, v4.4.166, v3.18.128, v4.19.8: Build failed! Errors: ./include/linux/hardirq.h:65:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘arch_nmi_enter’; did you mean ‘rcu_nmi_enter’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] ./include/linux/hardirq.h:84:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘arch_nmi_exit’; did you mean ‘rcu_nmi_exit’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] v4.14.87: Build failed! Errors: ./include/linux/hardirq.h:65:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘arch_nmi_enter’; did you mean ‘rcu_nmi_enter’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] ./include/linux/hardirq.h:84:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘arch_nmi_exit’; did you mean ‘rcu_nmi_exit’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] v4.9.144: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 096683724cb2 ("arm64: unwind: avoid percpu indirection for irq stack") 34be98f4944f ("arm64: kernel: remove {THREAD,IRQ_STACK}_START_SP") a9ea0017ebe8 ("arm64: factor out current_stack_pointer") c02433dd6de3 ("arm64: split thread_info from task stack") c7365330753c ("arm64: unwind: disregard frame.sp when validating frame pointer") dbc9344a68e5 ("arm64: clean up THREAD_* definitions") f60ad4edcf07 ("arm64: clean up irq stack definitions") f60fe78f1332 ("arm64: use an irq stack pointer") v4.4.166: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 096683724cb2 ("arm64: unwind: avoid percpu indirection for irq stack") 0a8ea52c3eb1 ("arm64: Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature") 132cd887b5c5 ("arm64: Modify stack trace and dump for use with irq_stack") 1ffe199b1c9b ("arm64: when walking onto the task stack, check sp & fp are in current->stack") 20380bb390a4 ("arm64: ftrace: fix a stack tracer's output under function graph tracer") 7596abf2e566 ("arm64: irq: fix walking from irq stack to task stack") 8e23dacd12a4 ("arm64: Add do_softirq_own_stack() and enable irq_stacks") 971c67ce37cf ("arm64: reduce stack use in irq_handler") a80a0eb70c35 ("arm64: make irq_stack_ptr more robust") c7365330753c ("arm64: unwind: disregard frame.sp when validating frame pointer") f60ad4edcf07 ("arm64: clean up irq stack definitions") f60fe78f1332 ("arm64: use an irq stack pointer") fe13f95b7200 ("arm64: pass a task parameter to unwind_frame()") v3.18.128: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 020295b4cb5b ("ACPI / processor: Make it possible to get CPU hardware ID via GICC") 132cd887b5c5 ("arm64: Modify stack trace and dump for use with irq_stack") 13ca62b243f6 ("ACPI: Fix minor syntax issues in processor_core.c") 37655163ce1a ("ARM64 / ACPI: Get RSDP and ACPI boot-time tables") 587064b610c7 ("arm64: Add framework for legacy instruction emulation") 652261a7a86c ("ACPI: fix acpi_os_ioremap for arm64") 828aef376d7a ("ACPI / processor: Introduce phys_cpuid_t for CPU hardware ID") 96f0e00378d4 ("ARM: add basic support for on-demand backtrace of other CPUs") af2c632e234f ("arm64/include/asm: Fixed a warning about 'struct pt_regs'") af8f3f514d19 ("ACPI / processor: Convert apic_id to phys_id to make it arch agnostic") b4ff8389ed14 ("xen/events: Always allocate legacy interrupts on PV guests") d02dc27db0dc ("ACPI / processor: Rename acpi_(un)map_lsapic() to acpi_(un)map_cpu()") d60fc3892c4d ("irqchip: Add GICv2 specific ACPI boot support") ecf5636dcd59 ("ACPI: Add interfaces to parse IOAPIC ID for IOAPIC hotplug") f60ad4edcf07 ("arm64: clean up irq stack definitions") f60fe78f1332 ("arm64: use an irq stack pointer") How should we proceed with this patch? -- Thanks, Sasha --===============0487969178506171221== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel --===============0487969178506171221==--