From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Explicitly include linux/major.h where it is
 needed
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 07:58:43 +0200
Message-ID: <20200617055843.GB25631@kroah.com>
References: <20200617092614.7897ccb2@canb.auug.org.au>
 <20200617092747.0cadb2de@canb.auug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:40264 "EHLO mail.kernel.org"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1725929AbgFQF6q (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 17 Jun 2020 01:58:46 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200617092747.0cadb2de@canb.auug.org.au>
Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-arch.vger.kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Linux-kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 09:27:47AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> This is in preparation for removing the include of major.h where it is
> not needed.
> 
> These files were found using
> 
> 	grep -E -L '[<"](uapi/)?linux/major\.h' $(git grep -l -w -f /tmp/xx)
> 
> where /tmp/xx contains all the symbols defined in major.h.  There were
> a couple of files in that list that did not need the include since the
> references are in comments.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

Any reason this had an RFC, but patch 2/2 did not?

They look good to me, I will be glad to take these, but do you still
want reviews from others for this?  It seems simple enough to me...

thanks,

greg k-h