linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Linux-kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Explicitly include linux/major.h where it is needed
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 09:12:03 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200630091203.55cdd5d9@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200617055843.GB25631@kroah.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1103 bytes --]

Hi Greg,

On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 07:58:43 +0200 Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 09:27:47AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > This is in preparation for removing the include of major.h where it is
> > not needed.
> > 
> > These files were found using
> > 
> > 	grep -E -L '[<"](uapi/)?linux/major\.h' $(git grep -l -w -f /tmp/xx)
> > 
> > where /tmp/xx contains all the symbols defined in major.h.  There were
> > a couple of files in that list that did not need the include since the
> > references are in comments.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>  
> 
> Any reason this had an RFC, but patch 2/2 did not?
> 
> They look good to me, I will be glad to take these, but do you still
> want reviews from others for this?  It seems simple enough to me...

I am going to do another round of this patchset splitting out most of
the "safe" removals that can be done anytime so other maintainers can
take them.  Then there will be the left over order dependent changes at
the end.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-29 23:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-16 23:26 [RFC Patch 0/2] fix up includes of linux/major.h Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-16 23:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-16 23:27 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] Explicitly include linux/major.h where it is needed Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-17  5:58   ` Greg KH
2020-06-17  6:18     ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-17  6:18       ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-22  4:25       ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-22  7:22         ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-29 23:12     ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2020-06-30  8:45       ` Greg KH
2020-06-16 23:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] Remove the include of linux/major.h from files that do not need it Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200630091203.55cdd5d9@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).