linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/12] mm: HUGE_VMAP arch support cleanup
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 13:14:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200821131422.110abb1a0c0b6a9d378b0e48@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200821151216.1005117-6-npiggin@gmail.com>

On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 01:12:09 +1000 Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:

> This changes the awkward approach where architectures provide init
> functions to determine which levels they can provide large mappings for,
> to one where the arch is queried for each call.
> 
> This removes code and indirection, and allows constant-folding of dead
> code for unsupported levels.
> 
> This also adds a prot argument to the arch query. This is unused
> currently but could help with some architectures (e.g., some powerpc
> processors can't map uncacheable memory with large pages).
> 
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/vmalloc.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/vmalloc.h
> @@ -1,4 +1,12 @@
>  #ifndef _ASM_ARM64_VMALLOC_H
>  #define _ASM_ARM64_VMALLOC_H
>  
> +#include <asm/page.h>
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP
> +bool arch_vmap_p4d_supported(pgprot_t prot);
> +bool arch_vmap_pud_supported(pgprot_t prot);
> +bool arch_vmap_pmd_supported(pgprot_t prot);
> +#endif

Moving these out of generic code and into multiple arch headers is
unfortunate.  Can we leave them in include/linux/somewhere?  And remove
the ifdefs, if so inclined - they just move the build error from
link-time to compile-time, and such an error shouldn't occur!


  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-21 20:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-21 15:12 [PATCH v6 00/12] huge vmalloc mappings Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-21 15:12 ` [PATCH v6 01/12] mm/vmalloc: fix vmalloc_to_page for huge vmap mappings Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-21 20:07   ` Andrew Morton
2020-08-21 22:42     ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-21 15:12 ` [PATCH v6 02/12] mm: apply_to_pte_range warn and fail if a large pte is encountered Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-21 15:12 ` [PATCH v6 03/12] mm/vmalloc: rename vmap_*_range vmap_pages_*_range Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-21 15:12 ` [PATCH v6 04/12] mm/ioremap: rename ioremap_*_range to vmap_*_range Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-21 15:12 ` [PATCH v6 05/12] mm: HUGE_VMAP arch support cleanup Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-21 20:14   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2020-08-21 22:45     ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-21 15:12 ` [PATCH v6 06/12] powerpc: inline huge vmap supported functions Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-21 20:15   ` Andrew Morton
2020-08-21 15:12 ` [PATCH v6 07/12] arm64: " Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-21 15:12 ` [PATCH v6 08/12] x86: " Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-21 15:12 ` [PATCH v6 09/12] mm: Move vmap_range from mm/ioremap.c to mm/vmalloc.c Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-21 15:12 ` [PATCH v6 10/12] mm/vmalloc: add vmap_range_noflush variant Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-21 15:12 ` [PATCH v6 11/12] mm/vmalloc: Hugepage vmalloc mappings Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-21 15:38   ` Eric Dumazet
2020-08-21 16:05     ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-21 15:12 ` [PATCH v6 12/12] powerpc/64s/radix: Enable huge " Nicholas Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200821131422.110abb1a0c0b6a9d378b0e48@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).