From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0EEDC28E83 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 07:47:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EDC6206A5 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 07:47:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726151AbgIDHr6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Sep 2020 03:47:58 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:40731 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726415AbgIDHr5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Sep 2020 03:47:57 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id EBAAE68AFE; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 09:47:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 09:47:53 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Al Viro Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Linus Torvalds , Michael Ellerman , x86@kernel.org, Alexey Dobriyan , Luis Chamberlain , Kees Cook , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] x86: remove address space overrides using set_fs() Message-ID: <20200904074753.GA14932@lst.de> References: <20200903142242.925828-1-hch@lst.de> <20200903142242.925828-13-hch@lst.de> <20200904025510.GO1236603@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200904063813.GA12204@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200904063813.GA12204@lst.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 08:38:13AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Wait a sec... how is that supposed to build with X86_5LEVEL? Do you mean > > > > #define LOAD_TASK_SIZE_MINUS_N(n) \ > > ALTERNATIVE __stringify(mov $((1 << 47) - 4096 - (n)),%rdx), \ > > __stringify(mov $((1 << 56) - 4096 - (n)),%rdx), X86_FEATURE_LA57 > > > > there? > > Don't ask me about the how, but it builds and works with X86_5LEVEL, > and the style is copied from elsewhere.. Actually, it doesn't any more. Looks like the change to pass the n parameter as suggested by Linus broke the previously working version.