From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151CCC55179 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 17:39:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B14D1222E9 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 17:39:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1603301949; bh=4iEIctvdvmRFrzHXHcr1BSF68GvXpK4ZkMDRruitkMA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=tjwXbCHxTvZhD8oxkLygnzw4540BBDaFcJyPl//r5x0XPR019oaKmUb/dGC6uB+Nc YpfLl9xe9MZyoJDkK6oZhN786N9qnvbiFmhclT120sLscG1Ic4tjYdBa31TgNnZPC3 jA/SkwMDLob5iHEmTIZbGbvx24wYyDmlf3ccXgJQ= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2503651AbgJURjH (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:39:07 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:58388 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2503580AbgJURjG (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:39:06 -0400 Received: from willie-the-truck (236.31.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.31.236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BCBA92224E; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 17:39:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1603301945; bh=4iEIctvdvmRFrzHXHcr1BSF68GvXpK4ZkMDRruitkMA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=YawMNNPRd3A+51raFvvrqQXUg9hhKOi+6KPwX2ebEO0KJUdixZCkgc8Vyb/fCgdAC mskoRwyEQOjV245zWcjUR+6zJSmfvT9S6lckHZT08HW91URNMMwoMwDulMdZxMUCOB J/HJS7RnV2HgMGu8smxhmxx/fTHo6Rbin7cElFdE= Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 18:39:00 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Catalin Marinas Cc: Qais Yousef , Marc Zyngier , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Morten Rasmussen , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linus Torvalds , James Morse , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: Add support for asymmetric AArch32 EL0 configurations Message-ID: <20201021173859.GA18370@willie-the-truck> References: <20201021104611.2744565-1-qais.yousef@arm.com> <20201021104611.2744565-3-qais.yousef@arm.com> <20201021153911.GC18071@willie-the-truck> <20201021162121.bdiopxvzscbhzzpt@e107158-lin> <20201021165246.GH3976@gaia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201021165246.GH3976@gaia> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 05:52:47PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 05:21:21PM +0100, Qais Yousef wrote: > > On 10/21/20 16:39, Will Deacon wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 11:46:09AM +0100, Qais Yousef wrote: > > > > When the CONFIG_ASYMMETRIC_AARCH32 option is enabled (EXPERT), the type > > > > of the ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL0 capability becomes WEAK_LOCAL_CPU_FEATURE. > > > > The kernel will now return true for system_supports_32bit_el0() and > > > > checks 32-bit tasks are affined to AArch32 capable CPUs only in > > > > do_notify_resume(). If the affinity contains a non-capable AArch32 CPU, > > > > the tasks will get SIGKILLed. If the last CPU supporting 32-bit is > > > > offlined, the kernel will SIGKILL any scheduled 32-bit tasks (the > > > > alternative is to prevent offlining through a new .cpu_disable feature > > > > entry). > > > > > > > > In addition to the relaxation of the ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL0 capability, > > > > this patch factors out the 32-bit cpuinfo and features setting into > > > > separate functions: __cpuinfo_store_cpu_32bit(), > > > > init_cpu_32bit_features(). The cpuinfo of the booting CPU > > > > (boot_cpu_data) is now updated on the first 32-bit capable CPU even if > > > > it is a secondary one. The ID_AA64PFR0_EL0_64BIT_ONLY feature is relaxed > > > > to FTR_NONSTRICT and FTR_HIGHER_SAFE when the asymmetric AArch32 support > > > > is enabled. The compat_elf_hwcaps are only verified for the > > > > AArch32-capable CPUs to still allow hotplugging AArch64-only CPUs. > > > > > > > > Make sure that KVM never sees the asymmetric 32bit system. Guest can > > > > still ignore ID registers and force run 32bit at EL0. > > > > > > > > Co-developed-by: Qais Yousef > > > > Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas > > > > Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h > > > > index 5e784e16ee89..312974ab2c85 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h > > > > @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ void arch_release_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk); > > > > #define TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE 3 /* CPU's FP state is not current's */ > > > > #define TIF_UPROBE 4 /* uprobe breakpoint or singlestep */ > > > > #define TIF_FSCHECK 5 /* Check FS is USER_DS on return */ > > > > +#define TIF_CHECK_32BIT_AFFINITY 6 /* Check thread affinity for asymmetric AArch32 */ > > > > > > I've looked through the patch and I still can't figure out why this extra > > > flag is needed. We know if a CPU supports 32-bit EL0, and we know whether > > > or not a task is 32-bit. So why the extra flag? Is it just a hangover from > > > the old series? > > > > It did evolve a bit organically. > > > > AFAICS it helps as an optimization to avoid the checks unnecessarily. If it's > > not expensive to do the checks in the loop in do_notify_resume() we can omit > > it. We will still protect it with system_supports_asym_32bit_el0() so the check > > is done on these systems only. > > Ah, I think I remember now. We didn't want ret_to_user (entry.S) to > always go the work_pending path if there was no context switch for a > 32-bit task. With the AArch32 check in do_notify_resume(), it would mean > we add _TIF_32BIT to the _TIF_WORK_MASK. > > However, we could add an asm alternative if AArch32 asym is detected to > always route TIF_32BIT tasks to work_pending. Or could we just use TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME, like we for for rseq()? Will