From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH v7 16/22] sched: Defer wakeup in ttwu() for unschedulable frozen tasks
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 16:14:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210525151432.16875-17-will@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210525151432.16875-1-will@kernel.org>
Asymmetric systems may not offer the same level of userspace ISA support
across all CPUs, meaning that some applications cannot be executed by
some CPUs. As a concrete example, upcoming arm64 big.LITTLE designs do
not feature support for 32-bit applications on both clusters.
Although we take care to prevent explicit hot-unplug of all 32-bit
capable CPUs on such a system, this is required when suspending on some
SoCs where the firmware mandates that the suspend/resume operation is
handled by CPU 0, which may not be capable of running 32-bit tasks.
Consequently, there is a window on the resume path where no 32-bit
capable CPUs are available for scheduling and waking up a 32-bit task
will result in a scheduler BUG() due to failure of select_fallback_rq():
| kernel BUG at kernel/sched/core.c:2858!
| Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
| ...
| Call trace:
| select_fallback_rq+0x4b0/0x4e4
| try_to_wake_up.llvm.4388853297126348405+0x460/0x5b0
| default_wake_function+0x1c/0x30
| autoremove_wake_function+0x1c/0x60
| __wake_up_common.llvm.11763074518265335900+0x100/0x1b8
| __wake_up+0x78/0xc4
| ep_poll_callback+0x20c/0x3fc
Prevent wakeups of unschedulable frozen tasks in ttwu() and instead
defer the wakeup to __thaw_tasks(), which runs only once all the
secondary CPUs are back online.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
kernel/freezer.c | 10 +++++++++-
kernel/sched/core.c | 13 +++++++++++++
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/freezer.c b/kernel/freezer.c
index dc520f01f99d..8f3d950c2a87 100644
--- a/kernel/freezer.c
+++ b/kernel/freezer.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#include <linux/syscalls.h>
#include <linux/freezer.h>
#include <linux/kthread.h>
+#include <linux/mmu_context.h>
/* total number of freezing conditions in effect */
atomic_t system_freezing_cnt = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
@@ -146,9 +147,16 @@ bool freeze_task(struct task_struct *p)
void __thaw_task(struct task_struct *p)
{
unsigned long flags;
+ const struct cpumask *mask = task_cpu_possible_mask(p);
spin_lock_irqsave(&freezer_lock, flags);
- if (frozen(p))
+ /*
+ * Wake up frozen tasks. On asymmetric systems where tasks cannot
+ * run on all CPUs, ttwu() may have deferred a wakeup generated
+ * before thaw_secondary_cpus() had completed so we generate
+ * additional wakeups here for tasks in the PF_FREEZER_SKIP state.
+ */
+ if (frozen(p) || (frozen_or_skipped(p) && mask != cpu_possible_mask))
wake_up_process(p);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&freezer_lock, flags);
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 42e2aecf087c..6cb9677d635a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3529,6 +3529,19 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags)
if (!(p->state & state))
goto unlock;
+#ifdef CONFIG_FREEZER
+ /*
+ * If we're going to wake up a thread which may be frozen, then
+ * we can only do so if we have an active CPU which is capable of
+ * running it. This may not be the case when resuming from suspend,
+ * as the secondary CPUs may not yet be back online. See __thaw_task()
+ * for the actual wakeup.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(frozen_or_skipped(p)) &&
+ !cpumask_intersects(cpu_active_mask, task_cpu_possible_mask(p)))
+ goto unlock;
+#endif
+
trace_sched_waking(p);
/* We're going to change ->state: */
--
2.31.1.818.g46aad6cb9e-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-25 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-25 15:14 [PATCH v7 00/22] Add support for 32-bit tasks on asymmetric AArch32 systems Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 01/22] sched: Favour predetermined active CPU as migration destination Will Deacon
2021-05-26 11:14 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-05-26 12:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-26 12:36 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-05-26 16:03 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-26 17:46 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 02/22] arm64: cpuinfo: Split AArch32 registers out into a separate struct Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 03/22] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 04/22] KVM: arm64: Kill 32-bit vCPUs on systems with mismatched " Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 05/22] arm64: Kill 32-bit applications scheduled on 64-bit-only CPUs Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 06/22] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 07/22] sched: Introduce task_cpu_possible_mask() to limit fallback rq selection Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 08/22] cpuset: Don't use the cpu_possible_mask as a last resort for cgroup v1 Will Deacon
2021-05-26 15:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-26 16:07 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 09/22] cpuset: Honour task_cpu_possible_mask() in guarantee_online_cpus() Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 10/22] sched: Reject CPU affinity changes based on task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon
2021-05-26 15:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-26 16:12 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-26 17:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-26 18:59 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 11/22] sched: Introduce task_struct::user_cpus_ptr to track requested affinity Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 12/22] sched: Split the guts of sched_setaffinity() into a helper function Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 13/22] sched: Allow task CPU affinity to be restricted on asymmetric systems Will Deacon
2021-05-26 16:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-26 16:35 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-26 16:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-26 17:02 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-27 7:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 14/22] sched: Introduce task_cpus_dl_admissible() to check proposed affinity Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 15/22] freezer: Add frozen_or_skipped() helper function Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2021-05-27 14:10 ` [PATCH v7 16/22] sched: Defer wakeup in ttwu() for unschedulable frozen tasks Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-27 14:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-27 14:44 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-27 14:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-27 14:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-28 10:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-27 14:36 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-01 8:21 ` [RFC][PATCH] freezer,sched: Rewrite core freezer logic Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-01 11:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-02 12:54 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-03 10:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-03 10:58 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-03 11:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-03 11:36 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 17/22] arm64: Implement task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 18/22] arm64: exec: Adjust affinity for compat tasks with mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 19/22] arm64: Prevent offlining first CPU with 32-bit EL0 on mismatched system Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 20/22] arm64: Hook up cmdline parameter to allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 21/22] arm64: Remove logic to kill 32-bit tasks on 64-bit-only cores Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 22/22] Documentation: arm64: describe asymmetric 32-bit support Will Deacon
2021-05-25 17:13 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-25 17:27 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-25 18:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-26 16:00 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210525151432.16875-17-will@kernel.org \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).