From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD55C4743E for ; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 17:18:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6C861408 for ; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 17:18:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229723AbhFFRUN (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jun 2021 13:20:13 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:44823 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229474AbhFFRUM (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jun 2021 13:20:12 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 156HE02l006674; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 12:14:00 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 156HDuDv006673; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 12:13:56 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2021 12:13:56 -0500 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Alan Stern Cc: Linus Torvalds , "Paul E. McKenney" , Peter Zijlstra , Will Deacon , Andrea Parri , Boqun Feng , Nick Piggin , David Howells , Jade Alglave , Luc Maranget , Akira Yokosawa , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch Subject: Re: [RFC] LKMM: Add volatile_if() Message-ID: <20210606171356.GV18427@gate.crashing.org> References: <20210604205600.GB4397@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> <20210604214010.GD4397@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> <20210605145739.GB1712909@rowland.harvard.edu> <20210606001418.GH4397@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> <20210606012903.GA1723421@rowland.harvard.edu> <20210606125955.GT18427@gate.crashing.org> <20210606134749.GB1736178@rowland.harvard.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210606134749.GB1736178@rowland.harvard.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 09:47:49AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > GCC does not pretend it can understand the asm. But it can see when > > two asm statements are identical. > > How similar do two asm strings have to be before they are considered > identical? For instance, do changes to the amount of leading or > trailing whitespace matter? They have to be identical to be considered identical. > Or what about including an empty assembly statement in one but not the > other? GCC does not parse the assembler template. Segher