From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4808BC4332F for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:07:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B5261002 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:07:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233617AbhI0JJe (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Sep 2021 05:09:34 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:47333 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233602AbhI0JJb (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Sep 2021 05:09:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1632733673; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KVP7Xe4ufaNCXcd20wpSSrMBsG9usYiBh4tpjUVxTUI=; b=A87jVk+oepUAxtpitt31u+xGVoIIAZhHvRG1ytMIxJ+Evgb5oKfi/FAAY/t0EhtGY2B8lu GsmusM22kaoZRJikJg9TYi0PoN98zEYTRM/R/2H1BcIJJCkx8JRF3r39x/pYwXMPCOrKZ5 1Co2wrNmMfgPWkUPO8PgrqhlcK68OmY= Received: from mail-wr1-f72.google.com (mail-wr1-f72.google.com [209.85.221.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-509-SFGbf0kgOXeJKXBgJXYCpQ-1; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 05:07:51 -0400 X-MC-Unique: SFGbf0kgOXeJKXBgJXYCpQ-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f72.google.com with SMTP id x7-20020a5d6507000000b0015dada209b1so13701684wru.15 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 02:07:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=KVP7Xe4ufaNCXcd20wpSSrMBsG9usYiBh4tpjUVxTUI=; b=pfzETxjRSCCy2R+CFN3Ueh3HsOF5N8d0fp6Qo7btJg8vU5M1KPW/BDqrAIHIGM6f7B bJBShkX9xRC2N3fadXlwd+hpGbFJkeg20BGEl80Yy6IFNG/Yvnt4PsJnCoQf+QC0qI++ rv99mnxcXvrlzHfd+trICiIJOgCSdfn/kXnmPt2VJpLl+WsgTgx2s+lY8jDDc+byS1pG k2KsMRs4FgD2wnBibZKw7POGooy2djMdO4JQNL9fQyfCEjewaPyKLtD/IAWCXPeP2HAS 6plZTjElolUFHQNCsTCuCB2gHriysy0SDqKwigBM4ZIjRnLAk0rTMC+8wFDDt7N84Mcw LZjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532+YzbGJ6QtomShn7CVfTDtaZc3MZwqbq6GYu73Qsx444ry5ECo gDOIvVURlNVxPuFOq5Endp4KnURT8y7dB1idoyHaltnsS/UBGM4Bx7Gi+8a1i4Dlj/TOluHDzzI IZL1fnJqNHoDl+EiIXGHdkw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:608e:: with SMTP id w14mr26547276wrt.18.1632733670882; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 02:07:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwC5dYp72FkeZBf/nNTyOGuT0oOk/w7Q1ed5WCCglQAPy4Z5zq+YWXxX5Bel6h9RljJshmxpg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:608e:: with SMTP id w14mr26547249wrt.18.1632733670649; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 02:07:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com ([2.55.16.138]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i203sm20492120wma.7.2021.09.27.02.07.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 27 Sep 2021 02:07:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 05:07:42 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Andi Kleen Cc: Dan Williams , "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Peter Zijlstra , Andy Lutomirski , Bjorn Helgaas , Richard Henderson , Thomas Bogendoerfer , James E J Bottomley , Helge Deller , "David S . Miller" , Arnd Bergmann , Jonathan Corbet , Peter H Anvin , Dave Hansen , Tony Luck , Kirill Shutemov , Sean Christopherson , Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan , X86 ML , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux PCI , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch , Linux Doc Mailing List , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/15] pci: Add pci_iomap_shared{,_range} Message-ID: <20210927044738-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20210829112105-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <09b340dd-c8a8-689c-4dad-4fe0e36d39ae@linux.intel.com> <20210829181635-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <3a88a255-a528-b00a-912b-e71198d5f58f@linux.intel.com> <20210830163723-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <69fc30f4-e3e2-add7-ec13-4db3b9cc0cbd@linux.intel.com> <20210910054044-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20210911195006-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 03:43:40PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > Hmm, yes that's true. I guess we can make it default to opt-in for > > > pci_iomap. > > > > > > It only really matters for device less ioremaps. > > OK. And same thing for other things with device, such as > > devm_platform_ioremap_resource. > > If we agree on all that, this will basically remove virtio > > changes from the picture ;) > > Hi we revisited this now. One problem with removing the ioremap opt-in is > that it's still possible for drivers to get at devices without going through > probe. For example they can walk the PCI device list. Some drivers do that > for various reasons. So if we remove the opt-in we would need to audit and > possibly fix all that, which would be potentially a lot of churn. That's why > I think it's better to keep the opt-in. > > > -Andi > I've been thinking about why this still feels wrong to me. Here's what I came up with: at some point someone will want one of these modules (poking at devices in the initcall) in the encrypted environment, and will change ioremap to ioremap_shared. At that point the allowlist will be broken again, and by that time it will be set in stone and too late to fix. Isn't the problem that what is actually audited is modules, but you are trying to add devices to allow list? So why not have modules/initcalls in the allowlist then? For built-in modules, we already have initcall_blacklisted, right? This could be an extension ... no? -- MST