linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Christophe Leroy' <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	'Linus Torvalds' <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	"Nick Desaulniers" <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	"Luis Chamberlain" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: remove the last set_fs() in common code, and remove it for x86 and powerpc v3
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:26:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <59a64e9a210847b59f70f9bd2d02b5c3@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <186a62fc-042c-d6ab-e7dc-e61b18945498@csgroup.eu>

From: Christophe Leroy
> Sent: 10 September 2020 09:14
> 
> Le 10/09/2020 à 10:04, David Laight a écrit :
> > From: Linus Torvalds
> >> Sent: 09 September 2020 22:34
> >> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 11:42 AM Segher Boessenkool
> >> <segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> It will not work like this in GCC, no.  The LLVM people know about that.
> >>> I do not know why they insist on pushing this, being incompatible and
> >>> everything.
> >>
> >> Umm. Since they'd be the ones supporting this, *gcc* would be the
> >> incompatible one, not clang.
> >
> > I had an 'interesting' idea.
> >
> > Can you use a local asm register variable as an input and output to
> > an 'asm volatile goto' statement?
> >
> > Well you can - but is it guaranteed to work :-)
> >
> 
> With gcc at least it should work according to
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Local-Register-Variables.html
> 
> They even explicitely tell: "The only supported use for this feature is
> to specify registers for input and output operands when calling Extended
> asm "

A quick test isn't good....

int bar(char *z)
{
        __label__ label;
        register int eax asm ("eax") = 6;
        asm volatile goto (" mov $1, %%eax" ::: "eax" : label);

label:
        return eax;
}

0000000000000040 <bar>:
  40:   b8 01 00 00 00          mov    $0x1,%eax
  45:   b8 06 00 00 00          mov    $0x6,%eax
  4a:   c3                      retq

although adding:
        asm volatile ("" : "+r" (eax));
either side of the 'asm volatile goto' does fix it.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-10  9:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-03 14:22 remove the last set_fs() in common code, and remove it for x86 and powerpc v3 Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 01/14] proc: remove a level of indentation in proc_get_inode Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 02/14] proc: cleanup the compat vs no compat file ops Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 03/14] proc: add a read_iter method to proc proc_ops Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 04/14] sysctl: Convert to iter interfaces Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 05/14] fs: don't allow kernel reads and writes without iter ops Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-01 22:38   ` Eric Biggers
2020-10-01 22:40     ` Al Viro
2020-10-02 16:27       ` Linus Torvalds
2020-10-09 22:06         ` Eric Biggers
2020-10-10  1:03           ` Linus Torvalds
2020-10-10  1:19             ` Eric Biggers
2020-10-10  1:29               ` Linus Torvalds
2020-10-10  1:55                 ` Alexander Viro
2020-10-14  5:51                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 06/14] fs: don't allow splice read/write without explicit ops Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 07/14] uaccess: add infrastructure for kernel builds with set_fs() Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 08/14] test_bitmap: remove user bitmap tests Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 09/14] lkdtm: remove set_fs-based tests Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 10/14] x86: move PAGE_OFFSET, TASK_SIZE & friends to page_{32,64}_types.h Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 11/14] x86: make TASK_SIZE_MAX usable from assembly code Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 12/14] x86: remove address space overrides using set_fs() Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-03 21:30   ` David Laight
2020-09-03 23:25     ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-04  7:59       ` David Laight
2020-09-04  2:55   ` Al Viro
2020-09-04  4:41     ` Al Viro
2020-09-04  6:38     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-04  7:47       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 13/14] powerpc: use non-set_fs based maccess routines Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 14/14] powerpc: remove address space overrides using set_fs() Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-03 15:43   ` Christophe Leroy
2020-09-03 15:49     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-03 15:56       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-03 16:03         ` Christophe Leroy
2020-09-03 14:28 ` remove the last set_fs() in common code, and remove it for x86 and powerpc v3 Al Viro
2020-09-03 14:30   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-03 14:36     ` Al Viro
2020-09-03 14:40       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-09 17:31   ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-09 18:40     ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-09-09 21:33       ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-10  8:04         ` David Laight
2020-09-10  8:13           ` Christophe Leroy
2020-09-10  9:26             ` David Laight [this message]
2020-09-10 12:26               ` David Laight
2020-09-10 15:20                 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-09-10 15:31                   ` David Laight
2020-09-10 17:15                     ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-09-10 15:16               ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-09-10 15:44         ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-09-03 15:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-04  6:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2020-09-04 17:58   ` Alexey Dobriyan
2020-09-04 18:42     ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-04 21:01     ` David Laight
2020-09-05  7:16       ` Christophe Leroy
2020-09-05 10:13         ` David Laight

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=59a64e9a210847b59f70f9bd2d02b5c3@AcuMS.aculab.com \
    --to=david.laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).