From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: asm-generic changes for 4.6 Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 23:29:31 -0700 Message-ID: References: <11845534.Q9psV3m4LA@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-ig0-f180.google.com ([209.85.213.180]:38124 "EHLO mail-ig0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751809AbcCYG3c (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Mar 2016 02:29:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <11845534.Q9psV3m4LA@wuerfel> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > asm-generic changes for 4.6 Btw, can you add "[GIT PULL]" to the subject line for your pulls? Or a "Please pull" in the body or similar. When I do pulls, my email filter looks for (surprise surprise) the terms "git" and "pull". And this didn't trigger either of those. The normal git request-pull script has that "git" part, and some people just add the "Please pull" to the email, and my filter will pick that up too. But the easiest and preferred way for me to see pull requests ends up being that "[GIT PULL]" in the subject line. For the same reason I prefer "[PATCH x/y]" in the subject line for patches. Not getting caught by my filter sometimes means that a pull gets delayed. Very seldom it might be overlooked entirely, but usually I do catch it later on after the other pulls (like happened now). Linus