From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC4C2C433EF for ; Wed, 18 May 2022 17:19:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240819AbiERRTI (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 May 2022 13:19:08 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55164 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240806AbiERRTH (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 May 2022 13:19:07 -0400 Received: from mail-vk1-xa2d.google.com (mail-vk1-xa2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80C5820E089; Wed, 18 May 2022 10:19:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vk1-xa2d.google.com with SMTP id q136so1489054vke.10; Wed, 18 May 2022 10:19:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/f4APx/MmD2R61Oq/wBqbBZa049BgS6jzCZYyWux6uw=; b=CRqJwsiNKT4sZEtqe3T41FiSRcnJ1GsrN97IRQZ6MZkmYh8ZdRyxXmtb/J94D0H61o UXlXak6BwEHPqc2i+M+cNvc+wf3aNRyAOIpBmDN/fIjJEV8pftJl6kSgPYBN3pEbXwLm bHZfYOVXsV1IfzwhXAWwHXg3ukhgzhZIRxWz8win7ObqSWummoAxcmSlondFXp08DZJ4 36/jI0h+mLOLIm+PhHabN6wQrZiXMkSwrSOeuYDSMkhROPYdHF0MW6UVpWeuZPpCZvlr IbfiGH1c3JqN/a2fSTNLxa4MWt7gRYQIbq3e/pyR3zd/D8QZT2xw/TM/14tLWOaQ765P KwNg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/f4APx/MmD2R61Oq/wBqbBZa049BgS6jzCZYyWux6uw=; b=O1aPuB+yzs2SpMcIC6TnpWK1K3aSz2LvmHJyOSJWG5tqUp4fHRnbytELoelCawhPQF Y3DohQucUtiSZahGa4OTZ3zWfh0ar74EAKsuuwMUSr83TER2Ge65BnFIIHbBmQcpB2y9 R26j7tHY5NdZuFdCGmmU+aFyHeGOfIb3hC7HoMiYuJj7T0QSGOy9f4EaMWM83PpZGZ5T R7T6fchovkBBh1i92x5Qqle2hJ9zZqwDJ18glJAwV+MRt2AUi9qB+xPDwkFIZ4o2gdCr glTqblW0NE510bXkJVm6sd9ANsh+KmoDYKFBPffpy9J0oOJY/sNFXJ243ATgcsToPVzB uU9g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5332MF2ifTMHYhBnaX5EiukODiFi0qtqmbHDU8iTPXQSBz1idSo5 EsN8ahHjE2WGg79ziOq+LtmBcMlRQ64r2pNqvJ8czkNMIak= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzf4sXua4bct76Oyku4J/3wXX8VMl6ys/ENNwkiwS8pSsja0y2cQ4G4/bZEmsVFbs/m4R20xIdtzkR0sQhil10= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:818:b0:357:26f8:5e73 with SMTP id 24-20020a056122081800b0035726f85e73mr243934vkj.5.1652894345690; Wed, 18 May 2022 10:19:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220518092619.1269111-1-chenhuacai@loongson.cn> In-Reply-To: From: Huacai Chen Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 01:18:53 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH V11 00/22] arch: Add basic LoongArch support To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Huacai Chen , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton , David Airlie , Jonathan Corbet , Linus Torvalds , linux-arch , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Xuefeng Li , Yanteng Si , Guo Ren , Xuerui Wang , Jiaxun Yang , Stephen Rothwell Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Hi, Arnd, On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 9:42 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 10:25 AM Huacai Chen wrote: > > > > LoongArch is a new RISC ISA, which is a bit like MIPS or RISC-V. > > LoongArch includes a reduced 32-bit version (LA32R), a standard 32-bit > > version (LA32S) and a 64-bit version (LA64). LoongArch use ACPI as its > > boot protocol LoongArch-specific interrupt controllers (similar to APIC) > > are already added in the next revision of ACPI Specification (current > > revision is 6.4). > > > > This patchset is adding basic LoongArch support in mainline kernel, we > > can see a complete snapshot here: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chenhuacai/linux-loongson.git/log/?h=loongarch-next > > Stephen, can you add this branch to the linux-next tree? > > I see there are still comments coming in, but at some point this has > to just be considered good enough that any further changes can be addressed > with patches on top rather than rebasing. > > > V10 -> V11: > > 1, Rebased on asm-generic tree; > > I was expecting that you'd base this on just the spinlock changes from Palmer's > tree that are part of the asm-generic tree rather than all of what I have. > > Can you rebase it once more? If there are conflicts against the h8300 removal > series that is also in asm-generic, leaving it on top of that may be > easier though. Thank you very much, I have rebased the below tree on asm-generic tree's spinlock commit 9282d0996936c5fbf877c0d096a3feb45 again, and fixed some small problems from Eric and WANG Xuerui's comments in V11. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chenhuacai/linux-loongson.git/log/?h=loongarch-next Huacai > > Arnd