From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674C6C83013 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 05:47:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 196D72222A for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 05:47:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728515AbgLBFre (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2020 00:47:34 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46736 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726125AbgLBFrd (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2020 00:47:33 -0500 Received: from mail-vk1-xa43.google.com (mail-vk1-xa43.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a43]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93FEFC0617A6 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 21:46:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vk1-xa43.google.com with SMTP id v185so143881vkf.8 for ; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 21:46:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zIYg3wn3IiOAwIUjN3HHnL/xxZ7BzmV6ArGGQCieAHY=; b=bON2yGnfCiyS2deASK7lq7vUUxyZx+TcNqxyx0Y2lzXGXaJk2/GGL6wVTlpf746M17 ewSfrj7S9dsZKHz9EXsFml/ZRzW3ibKt2hylTzUrhiQailV3BSYLijuRVIlNThE7Ss7H KnWN0tGzIrPrfvFAOAvf+8FI8ABAECA3BAv1o2Nf8hdcpJnE2U+4ENVHLDfsMJ2syTzS iaGmOfE/X9XwWP/ylcYRN5sQKiXL7/ZHlVEs4e0tCksSkzjQe+RVz9j9FQbs4OUZPc8T CR1MgHpyNAn/FzhGrLr7gcE7qYAYqX3l4Q2HISPXD2rjqVZX7wjj378ggI/rHdDvjDb8 F84w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zIYg3wn3IiOAwIUjN3HHnL/xxZ7BzmV6ArGGQCieAHY=; b=UoFGgdaYl3W+MJEAZHanoS+DzoMQM28UM755Vr5UeUFqiJ6zMcrWntSR0ljhY5uYG3 Gq9Rt+Y94Uq7a49daZxo1ipfpOUMIG/qPa9ucnxFBZveCs3kpFfm7M85BPN0JTSYK+7J NBoJCFusO6Ky5r7EMPBrU5LB1yrbOHPLstiMLGnQY7KnOdUMky3hfGsiGW88BajH0yif 0rl+u/sxfpa5r0yeLr+1M8Vg4fCmsI4iszwitOWiSud1HQjwjxfHZmQtYz7sj2oytLHL O5aVUGd1aRyQyHtnEN5pI7o54LwLYfOxJMLZW/1Kuv8c0P75wbyDUgRbuCK3Rcn1zUP2 b2Xg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531beAqKQZXP8N94VJ3xle5gbdgZFc5Bwwy1J/QLkopgvvoB3fnu iKEq+IMu1Xcxl+1XJ4wpmj/p2xqNtKfz5bRSRZLoQA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyfTarblbQWXQ2D0gqGJIM068ljJFblRKN2s+iu0HTYtaH2RdablEmO5KmOvdnbvJUKStvPOuGuLcyF9JZVZE8= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:36d4:: with SMTP id d203mr580407vka.22.1606888005927; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 21:46:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201118220731.925424-1-samitolvanen@google.com> <20201130120130.GF24563@willie-the-truck> <202012010929.3788AF5@keescook> In-Reply-To: From: Sami Tolvanen Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 21:46:33 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/17] Add support for Clang LTO To: Masahiro Yamada Cc: Kees Cook , Will Deacon , Steven Rostedt , Josh Poimboeuf , Peter Zijlstra , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Paul E. McKenney" , Nick Desaulniers , clang-built-linux , Kernel Hardening , linux-arch , linux-arm-kernel , Linux Kbuild mailing list , Linux Kernel Mailing List , PCI Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 6:43 PM Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 2:31 AM Kees Cook wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 12:01:31PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > > Hi Sami, > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 02:07:14PM -0800, Sami Tolvanen wrote: > > > > This patch series adds support for building the kernel with Clang's > > > > Link Time Optimization (LTO). In addition to performance, the primary > > > > motivation for LTO is to allow Clang's Control-Flow Integrity (CFI) to > > > > be used in the kernel. Google has shipped millions of Pixel devices > > > > running three major kernel versions with LTO+CFI since 2018. > > > > > > > > Most of the patches are build system changes for handling LLVM bitcode, > > > > which Clang produces with LTO instead of ELF object files, postponing > > > > ELF processing until a later stage, and ensuring initcall ordering. > > > > > > > > Note that v7 brings back arm64 support as Will has now staged the > > > > prerequisite memory ordering patches [1], and drops x86_64 while we work > > > > on fixing the remaining objtool warnings [2]. > > > > > > Sounds like you're going to post a v8, but that's the plan for merging > > > that? The arm64 parts look pretty good to me now. > > > > I haven't seen Masahiro comment on this in a while, so given the review > > history and its use (for years now) in Android, I will carry v8 (assuming > > all is fine with it) it in -next unless there are objections. > > > What I dislike about this implementation is > it cannot drop any unreachable function/data. > (and it is completely different from GCC LTO) > > This is not real LTO. I'm not sure I understand your concern. LTO cannot drop functions or data from vmlinux.o that may be referenced externally. However, with CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION, the linker certainly can drop unused functions and data when linking vmlinux, and there's no reason this option can't be used together with LTO. In fact, Pixel 3 does enable this option, but in our experience, there isn't much unused code or data to remove, so later devices no longer use it. There's technically no reason why we couldn't postpone LTO until we link vmlinux instead, and thus allow the linker to possibly remove more unused code without the help of --gc-sections, but at least with the current build process, that would involve performing the slow LTO link step multiple times, which isn't worth it when we can get the performance benefits (and CFI) already when linking vmlinux.o with LTO. Sami