From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53860C4741F for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:45:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF2682083B for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:45:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="Ap5w2JEW" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387542AbgI2Mpc (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 08:45:32 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48902 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1733304AbgI2Mpb (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 08:45:31 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x143.google.com (mail-lf1-x143.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::143]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 854A2C0613D0 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 05:45:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x143.google.com with SMTP id z19so5361356lfr.4 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 05:45:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZHvIyjp/HjptDKFZ4oCKWaRPRXAjZeylbH6QYR0nkL8=; b=Ap5w2JEWZC58HriJWOs4n2ZnDkichjsVyC8xFiq2J8SswFqIFF+himI2Q6etMI5Tor 0HAQ0uRCNVT/WCSSr80x6XAjFY/LQ4xwvOUMdklYKWopXOkbo6mG5pWiXGkjhL9AWhoR mkJd9fcd4WbUMOwMirSvxIqe90+JMueOwslLwTY1Cl1HLG6ybajV+IRsIMGc4lXQIPvR oBODo/qW8n02KjwwuwPp7JApZC1TKPk6oOBjT6/EC/0WfPQWnfnEONc9r+KHAJMXhd/6 OmuxVY2iKAbQcjHOl6urR/ZSN2Q9c1vixSIZuVdgIvuQVlkxZJPRljV05LRqtXRwdHLf cC0w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZHvIyjp/HjptDKFZ4oCKWaRPRXAjZeylbH6QYR0nkL8=; b=uEM5d0oc7pg+5D1wqIRBF8Vqs4rmmjTWTX2ETMGCEh/1ClmVdR1KLKAtFgWe+7FfvR Gobm1H1lW3D5FQMHSBY+RTxGbZtVN2ToSWdfW3WbnuHukQVYytGQtCw70Dab/APJwHfX ouVhdhjrlvXeqb0OxThEbbWJ04dq2A/gyvuLYPQNvCTluD5RHLUVH9roAZCk9KRCZ97W LIWNc30oUyKAHGXRxIV7ffzKDx0I858GG3KGz2A+8Zxuvg1GmRL+6ffb14ZaNO9XvE8E JLxGXD3nOmdfHrDUQoZH17gcgzrhnOqrfH8HMudPu304OGEbdV98XkFrXG/TLpa28/Kw 9m1w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ZN011qeVOBfBr95R0nQ9kgaKeQszszhjK/BN92P8UayPUPy2H Kszz47Nb3XWDSjGc2zb9qRx/rYs5k1mSYLFOiits1Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxwNJVl7N6DgZU+9k9hMFwLmdKNKDwg3mdA4F/dtZ/iDwTOnDvzTa5ao9aFnFxXSFDsSjTTwZJlbUKTXKsnnAc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:20c3:: with SMTP id u3mr1062919lfr.572.1601383528944; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 05:45:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200911225417.GA5286@shinobu> In-Reply-To: <20200911225417.GA5286@shinobu> From: Linus Walleij Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 14:45:18 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Introduce the for_each_set_clump macro To: William Breathitt Gray Cc: Syed Nayyar Waris , Andrew Morton , Andy Shevchenko , Michal Simek , Arnd Bergmann , Robert Richter , Bartosz Golaszewski , Masahiro Yamada , Zhang Rui , Daniel Lezcano , Amit Kucheria , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux ARM , Linux PM list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 12:54 AM William Breathitt Gray wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 02:49:35PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > Hi Syed, > > > > sorry for taking so long. I was on vacation and a bit snowed > > under by work. > > > > On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 10:10 AM Syed Nayyar Waris wrote: > > > > > Since this patchset primarily affects GPIO drivers, would you like > > > to pick it up through your GPIO tree? > > > > I have applied the patches to an immutable branch and pushed > > to kernelorg for testing (autobuilders will play with it I hope). > > > > If all works fine I will merge this into my devel branch for v5.9. > > > > It would be desirable if Andrew gave his explicit ACK on it too. > > > > Yours, > > Linus Walleij > > Hi Linus, > > What's the name of the branch with these patches on kernelorg; I'm > having trouble finding it? > > Btw, I'm CCing Andrew as well here because I notice him missing from the > CC list earlier for this patchset. IIRC there were complaints from the zeroday build robot so I dropped the branch and I am still waiting for a fixed up patch series. Yours, Linus Walleij