linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] m68k: fix livelock in uaccess
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2023 12:41:18 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wh8+LsDDd8AFMwaYHAA+eLT8O2ziEJfpoeo_H6MCg2NKg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y+AUEJpWYdUzW0OD@ZenIV>

On Sun, Feb 5, 2023 at 12:39 PM Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> BTW, since these patches would be much easier to backport than any unification
> work, I think the right thing to do would be to have further unification done on
> top of them.

Ack. I'm not NAKing the patches, I was just hoping that we also have
some way forward.

So "fix the issues, then unify" sounds like the right thing to do to me.

               Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-05 20:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-31 20:02 [RFC][PATCHSET] VM_FAULT_RETRY fixes Al Viro
2023-01-31 20:03 ` [PATCH 01/10] alpha: fix livelock in uaccess Al Viro
2023-03-07  0:48   ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
2023-01-31 20:03 ` [PATCH 02/10] hexagon: " Al Viro
2023-02-10  2:59   ` Brian Cain
2023-01-31 20:04 ` [PATCH 03/10] ia64: " Al Viro
2023-01-31 20:04 ` [PATCH 04/10] m68k: " Al Viro
2023-02-05  6:18   ` Finn Thain
2023-02-05 18:51     ` Linus Torvalds
2023-02-07  3:07       ` Finn Thain
2023-02-05 20:39     ` Al Viro
2023-02-05 20:41       ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2023-02-06 12:08   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-01-31 20:05 ` [PATCH 05/10] microblaze: " Al Viro
2023-01-31 20:05 ` [PATCH 06/10] nios2: " Al Viro
2023-01-31 20:06 ` [PATCH 07/10] openrisc: " Al Viro
2023-01-31 20:06 ` [PATCH 08/10] parisc: " Al Viro
2023-02-06 16:58   ` Helge Deller
2023-02-28 17:34     ` Al Viro
2023-02-28 18:26       ` Helge Deller
2023-02-28 19:14         ` Al Viro
2023-02-28 19:32           ` Helge Deller
2023-02-28 20:00             ` Helge Deller
2023-02-28 20:22               ` Helge Deller
2023-02-28 22:57                 ` Al Viro
2023-03-01  4:00                   ` Helge Deller
2023-03-02 17:53                     ` Al Viro
2023-02-28 15:22   ` Guenter Roeck
2023-02-28 19:18     ` Michael Schmitz
2023-01-31 20:06 ` [PATCH 09/10] riscv: " Al Viro
2023-02-06 20:06   ` Björn Töpel
2023-02-07 16:11   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-01-31 20:07 ` [PATCH 10/10] sparc: " Al Viro
2023-01-31 20:24 ` [RFC][PATCHSET] VM_FAULT_RETRY fixes Linus Torvalds
2023-01-31 21:10   ` Al Viro
2023-01-31 21:19     ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-31 21:49       ` Al Viro
2023-02-01  0:00         ` Linus Torvalds
2023-02-01 19:48           ` Peter Xu
2023-02-01 22:18             ` Al Viro
2023-02-02  0:57               ` Al Viro
2023-02-02 22:56               ` Peter Xu
2023-02-04  0:26                 ` Al Viro
2023-02-05  5:10                   ` Al Viro
2023-02-04  0:47         ` [loongarch oddities] " Al Viro
2023-02-01  8:21       ` Helge Deller
2023-02-01 19:51         ` Linus Torvalds
2023-02-02  6:58       ` Al Viro
2023-02-02  8:54         ` Michael Cree
2023-02-02  9:56           ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-02-02 15:20           ` Al Viro
2023-02-02 20:20             ` Al Viro
2023-02-02 20:34         ` Linus Torvalds
2023-02-01 10:50 ` Mark Rutland
2023-02-06 12:08   ` Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHk-=wh8+LsDDd8AFMwaYHAA+eLT8O2ziEJfpoeo_H6MCg2NKg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
    --cc=fthain@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).