Re: [PATCH v4 05/10] signal: Introduce TRAP_PERF si_code and si_perf to siginfo

[Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>]

Hi Marco,

On 21.04.2021 20:23, Marco Elver wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 06:27PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 05:11PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
>>> +Cc linux-arm-kernel
>>>
>> [...]
>>>> I've managed to reproduce this issue with a public Raspberry Pi OS Lite
>>>> rootfs image, even without deploying kernel modules:
>>>>
>>>> https://downloads.raspberrypi.org/raspios_lite_armhf/images/raspios_lite_armhf-2021-03-25/2021-03-04-raspios-buster-armhf-lite.zip
>>>>
>>>> # qemu-system-arm -M virt -smp 2 -m 512 -kernel zImage -append "earlycon
>>>> console=ttyAMA0 root=/dev/vda2 rw rootwait" -serial stdio -display none
>>>> -monitor null -device virtio-blk-device,drive=virtio-blk -drive
>>>> file=/tmp/2021-03-04-raspios-buster-armhf-lite.img,id=virtio-blk,if=none,format=raw
>>>> -netdev user,id=user -device virtio-net-device,netdev=user
>>>>
>>>> The above one doesn't boot if zImage z compiled from commit fb6cc127e0b6
>>>> and boots if compiled from 2e498d0a74e5. In both cases I've used default
>>>> arm/multi_v7_defconfig and
>>>> gcc-linaro-6.4.1-2017.11-x86_64_arm-linux-gnueabi toolchain.
>>> Yup, I've narrowed it down to the addition of "__u64 _perf" to
>>> siginfo_t. My guess is the __u64 causes a different alignment for a
>>> bunch of adjacent fields. It seems that x86 and m68k are the only ones
>>> that have compile-time tests for the offsets. Arm should probably add
>>> those -- I have added a bucket of static_assert() in
>>> arch/arm/kernel/signal.c and see that something's off.
>>>
>>> I'll hopefully have a fix in a day or so.
>> Arm and compiler folks: are there some special alignment requirement for
>> __u64 on arm 32-bit? (And if there is for arm64, please shout as well.)
>>
>> With the static-asserts below, the only thing that I can do to fix it is
>> to completely remove the __u64. Padding it before or after with __u32
>> just does not work. It seems that the use of __u64 shifts everything
>> in __sifields by 4 bytes.
>>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h b/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h
>> index d0bb9125c853..b02a4ac55938 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h
>> @@ -92,7 +92,10 @@ union __sifields {
>>   				__u32 _pkey;
>>   			} _addr_pkey;
>>   			/* used when si_code=TRAP_PERF */
>> -			__u64 _perf;
>> +			struct {
>> +				__u32 _perf1;
>> +				__u32 _perf2;
>> +			} _perf;
>>   		};
>>   	} _sigfault;
>>
>> ^^ works, but I'd hate to have to split this into 2 __u32 because it
>> makes the whole design worse.
>>
>> What alignment trick do we have to do here to fix it for __u64?
> So I think we just have to settle on 'unsigned long' here. On many
> architectures, like 32-bit Arm, the alignment of a structure is that of
> its largest member. This means that there is no portable way to add
> 64-bit integers to siginfo_t on 32-bit architectures.
>
> In the case of the si_perf field, word size is sufficient since the data
> it contains is user-defined. On 32-bit architectures, any excess bits of
> perf_event_attr::sig_data will therefore be truncated when copying into
> si_perf.
>
> Feel free to test the below if you have time, but the below lets me boot
> 32-bit arm which previously timed out. It also passes all the
> static_asserts() I added (will send those as separate patches).
>
> Once I'm convinced this passes all others tests too, I'll send a patch.

This fixes the issue I've observed on my test systems. Feel free to add:

Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>

Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>


> Thanks,
> -- Marco
>
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/compat.h b/include/linux/compat.h
> index c8821d966812..f0d2dd35d408 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compat.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compat.h
> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ typedef struct compat_siginfo {
>   					u32 _pkey;
>   				} _addr_pkey;
>   				/* used when si_code=TRAP_PERF */
> -				compat_u64 _perf;
> +				compat_ulong_t _perf;
>   			};
>   		} _sigfault;
>   
> diff --git a/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h b/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h
> index d0bb9125c853..03d6f6d2c1fe 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h
> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ union __sifields {
>   				__u32 _pkey;
>   			} _addr_pkey;
>   			/* used when si_code=TRAP_PERF */
> -			__u64 _perf;
> +			unsigned long _perf;
>   		};
>   	} _sigfault;
>   
>
Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland