linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: pnagar@codeaurora.org
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com,
	Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com,
	Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
	linux-security-module <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	selinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	casey@schaufler-ca.com,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
	psodagud@codeaurora.org, nmardana@codeaurora.org,
	Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
	Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RTIC: selinux: ARM64: Move selinux_state to a separate page
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 10:36:32 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f6b1520b7712ef7cd248a8120badd061@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANiq72=O0RaHVRcKFF_YDDO4xDFdxaGdH94PgvuibK-ZzHvOxA@mail.gmail.com>

On 2021-02-17 02:02, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 11:22 AM Preeti Nagar <pnagar@codeaurora.org> 
> wrote:
>> 
>> The changes introduce a new security feature, RunTime Integrity Check
>> (RTIC), designed to protect Linux Kernel at runtime. The motivation
>> behind these changes is:
>> 1. The system protection offered by Security Enhancements(SE) for
>> Android relies on the assumption of kernel integrity. If the kernel
>> itself is compromised (by a perhaps as yet unknown future 
>> vulnerability),
>> SE for Android security mechanisms could potentially be disabled and
>> rendered ineffective.
>> 2. Qualcomm Snapdragon devices use Secure Boot, which adds 
>> cryptographic
>> checks to each stage of the boot-up process, to assert the 
>> authenticity
>> of all secure software images that the device executes.  However, due 
>> to
>> various vulnerabilities in SW modules, the integrity of the system can 
>> be
>> compromised at any time after device boot-up, leading to un-authorized
>> SW executing.
>> 
>> The feature's idea is to move some sensitive kernel structures to a
>> separate page and monitor further any unauthorized changes to these,
>> from higher Exception Levels using stage 2 MMU. Moving these to a
>> different page will help avoid getting page faults from un-related 
>> data.
>> The mechanism we have been working on removes the write permissions 
>> for
>> HLOS in the stage 2 page tables for the regions to be monitored, such
>> that any modification attempts to these will lead to faults being
>> generated and handled by handlers. If the protected assets are moved 
>> to
>> a separate page, faults will be generated corresponding to change 
>> attempts
>> to these assets only. If not moved to a separate page, write attempts 
>> to
>> un-related data present on the monitored pages will also be generated.
>> 
>> Using this feature, some sensitive variables of the kernel which are
>> initialized after init or are updated rarely can also be protected 
>> from
>> simple overwrites and attacks trying to modify these.
>> 
>> Currently, the change moves selinux_state structure to a separate 
>> page.
>> The page is 2MB aligned not 4K to avoid TLB related performance impact 
>> as,
>> for some CPU core designs, the TLB does not cache 4K stage 2 (IPA to 
>> PA)
>> mappings if the IPA comes from a stage 1 mapping. In future, we plan 
>> to
>> move more security-related kernel assets to this page to enhance
>> protection.
> 
> Part of this commit message should likely be added as a new file under
> Documentation/ somewhere.
> 
Yes, that will be helpful, will put it in Documentation/security in the
next update. Thank you!

>> diff --git a/security/Kconfig b/security/Kconfig
>> index 7561f6f..1af913a 100644
>> --- a/security/Kconfig
>> +++ b/security/Kconfig
>> @@ -291,5 +291,16 @@ config LSM
>> 
>>  source "security/Kconfig.hardening"
>> 
>> +config SECURITY_RTIC
>> +       bool "RunTime Integrity Check feature"
>> +       depends on ARM64
>> +       help
>> +         RTIC(RunTime Integrity Check) feature is to protect Linux 
>> kernel
>> +         at runtime. This relocates some of the security sensitive 
>> kernel
>> +         structures to a separate RTIC specific page.
>> +
>> +         This is to enable monitoring and protection of these kernel 
>> assets
>> +         from a higher exception level(EL) against any unauthorized 
>> changes.
> 
> Rewording suggestion:
> 
>          The RTIC (RunTime Integrity Check) feature protects the kernel
>          at runtime by relocating some of its security-sensitive 
> structures
>          to a separate RTIC-specific page. This enables monitoring and
>          and protecting them from a higher exception level against
>          unauthorized changes.
> 
Thanks :)

> Cheers,
> Miguel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-22  5:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-16 10:17 [PATCH] RTIC: selinux: ARM64: Move selinux_state to a separate page Preeti Nagar
2021-02-16 18:09 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-02-22  6:54   ` pnagar
2021-02-16 20:32 ` Miguel Ojeda
2021-02-22  5:06   ` pnagar [this message]
2021-02-17  9:42 ` Will Deacon
2021-02-17  9:53   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-22  7:14     ` pnagar
2021-02-17 10:15   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-22  4:58     ` pnagar
2021-02-22 10:56       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-22  9:50   ` peter enderborg
2021-03-05  2:21 ` Paul Moore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f6b1520b7712ef7cd248a8120badd061@codeaurora.org \
    --to=pnagar@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
    --cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=nmardana@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=psodagud@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).