From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9DACC4CEC9 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:23:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C88D21852 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:23:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="GFl7bGZu" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7C88D21852 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description :Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=bUD+AJrbVCwcJ6i/F7Raa/3eVFcwoQD1Nnih3GERe+k=; b=GFl7bGZuaG0/bE tR5vKPm6g9J0cnUAz84Jjki80UNbi5RS460eXcdvZNuIrL2jBHhFbv025cBhL9WaKr709JEIp+EXA B+JfGrTwsbXFxVrJ19WlGq2wbh2s3ww/21AarGVKErwgdzgR0NHEOoNu4duOSDCeVyl/ohSfSwqiB Ku9DlszG6LWGLusxUOLVaj3z8/kARUppzpAWLMHDy/htYEaTJiwmayYVfdBgtweMH6DrK7ZMOp4md DhGq/IlaNPJ/41aFBQfTJ3gtTt465T/ZjyZyftdEgpAenMJVB4A1oTfHx7CbzpWbC9utrOESW9jkQ 0AnZAzYY8fW1AUmGidPA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.2 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iA9iC-0007yc-N5; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:23:52 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.2 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iA9i8-0007yA-27 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:23:49 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31AD928; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 02:23:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.197.61] (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 787C33F59C; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 02:23:45 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [Question-GIC-v4.1] Plan on GIC-v4.1 driver development To: Shaokun Zhang , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu References: <40d7276c-54a3-0cca-a207-217459850c21@hisilicon.com> From: Marc Zyngier Organization: Approximate Message-ID: <0501c049-67a6-9a63-e0d9-e043573e1211@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 10:23:43 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <40d7276c-54a3-0cca-a207-217459850c21@hisilicon.com> Content-Language: en-US X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190917_022348_147677_8BFA8874 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.55 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Tangnianyao \(ICT\)" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 17/09/2019 03:15, Shaokun Zhang wrote: > Hi Marc, > > This is from Nianyao Tang. > > I'm planning to do some verification on our GIC-v4.1 implement. I would like some > information about linux GIC-v4.1 driver. When will linux support GIC-v4.1 or what's > the plan on developing GIC-v4.1 driver? The easy answer is that yes, there is a plan. There is some code, even, just not quite in a usable state yet. I'll try to push something out once I get a chance. M. -- Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny... _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel