Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: Initial RTD1619 SoC and Realtek Mjolnir EVB support

["Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>]

Hi James,

Am 08.11.19 um 10:42 schrieb James Tai:
> Add Device Trees for Realtek RTD1619 SoC family, RTD1619 SoC and
> Realtek Mjolnir EVB.
> 
> Signed-off-by: James Tai <james.tai@realtek.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/Makefile          |   2 +
>  .../boot/dts/realtek/rtd1619-mjolnir.dts      |  40 +++++
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/rtd1619.dtsi      |  12 ++
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/rtd16xx.dtsi      | 154 ++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 208 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/rtd1619-mjolnir.dts
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/rtd1619.dtsi
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/rtd16xx.dtsi
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/Makefile
> index 555638ada721..8f6aa77c265b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/Makefile
> @@ -7,3 +7,5 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_REALTEK) += rtd1295-probox2-ava.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_REALTEK) += rtd1295-zidoo-x9s.dtb
>  
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_REALTEK) += rtd1296-ds418.dtb
> +
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_REALTEK) += rtd1619-mjolnir.dtb
> \ No newline at end of file

Now we're at the other extreme: That warning should not be there either.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/rtd1619-mjolnir.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/rtd1619-mjolnir.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..fd59b086e5d8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/rtd1619-mjolnir.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-or-later OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2019 Realtek Semiconductor Corp.
> + */
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +#include "rtd1619.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> +	compatible = "realtek,rtd1619","realtek,mjolnir";

Please leave a single space after the comma between strings (like I did
when suggesting it).

The order is wrong, it goes from most specific to least specific, and
violates your binding.

> +	model= "Realtek Mjolnir EVB";
> +
> +	memory@0 {
> +		device_type = "memory";
> +		reg = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x80000000>;
> +	};
> +
> +	chosen {
> +		stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
> +	};
> +
> +	aliases {
> +		serial0 = &uart0;
> +		serial1 = &uart1;
> +		serial2 = &uart2;
> +	};
> +};
> +
> +&uart0 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&uart1 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&uart2 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +};

Please add comments before each node where they are on the board - keep
in mind that few reviewers and contributors including myself will have
access to your board's documentation.

UART0 is chosen as debug console above.
UART1 appears to be on one of the M.2?
Where is UART2 used, GPIO connector or the second M.2?

While you're welcome to have all these node references here for
documentation if accessible, please only enable devices that are
actually usable. I.e., set status = "disabled" if the bootloader does
not turn the clock gates on, take them out of reset, set the pinmux
correctly, etc. (Yes, you can repeat it here even if in .dtsi.)

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/rtd1619.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/rtd1619.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e52bf708b04e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/rtd1619.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-or-later OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +/*
> + * Realtek RTD1619 SoC
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2019 Realtek Semiconductor Corp.
> + */
> +
> +#include "rtd16xx.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> +	compatible = "realtek,rtd1619";
> +};
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/rtd16xx.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/rtd16xx.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b23e675e2816
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/rtd16xx.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-or-later OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +/*
> + * Realtek RTD16xx SoC family
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2019 Realtek Semiconductor Corp.
> + */
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> +
> +/{
> +	interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> +	#address-cells = <2>;
> +	#size-cells = <2>;
> +
> +	cpus {
> +		#address-cells = <1>;
> +		#size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +		cpu0: cpu@0 {
> +			device_type = "cpu";
> +			compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> +			reg = <0x0>;
> +			enable-method = "psci";
> +			next-level-cache = <&l2>;
> +		};
> +
> +		cpu1: cpu@100 {
> +			device_type = "cpu";
> +			compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> +			reg = <0x100>;
> +			enable-method = "psci";
> +			next-level-cache = <&l3>;
> +		};
> +
> +		cpu2: cpu@200 {
> +			device_type = "cpu";
> +			compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> +			reg = <0x200>;
> +			enable-method = "psci";
> +			next-level-cache = <&l3>;
> +		};
> +
> +		cpu3: cpu@300 {
> +			device_type = "cpu";
> +			compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> +			reg = <0x300>;
> +			enable-method = "psci";
> +			next-level-cache = <&l3>;
> +		};
> +
> +		cpu4: cpu@400 {
> +			device_type = "cpu";
> +			compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> +			reg = <0x400>;
> +			enable-method = "psci";
> +			next-level-cache = <&l3>;
> +		};
> +
> +		cpu5: cpu@500 {
> +			device_type = "cpu";
> +			compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> +			reg = <0x500>;
> +			enable-method = "psci";
> +			next-level-cache = <&l3>;
> +		};
> +
> +		l2: l2-cache {
> +			compatible = "cache";
> +			next-level-cache = <&l3>;
> +
> +		};
> +
> +		l3: l3-cache {
> +			compatible = "cache";
> +		};
> +	};
> +
> +	timer {
> +		compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
> +		interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>,
> +			     <GIC_PPI 14 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>,
> +			     <GIC_PPI 11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>,
> +			     <GIC_PPI 10 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
> +	};
> +
> +	arm_pmu: pmu {
> +		compatible = "arm,armv8-pmuv3";
> +		interrupts = <GIC_PPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
> +	};
> +
> +	psci {
> +		compatible = "arm,psci-1.0";

No feedback from Lorenzo or Rob for v1 here yet...

> +		method = "smc";
> +	};
> +
> +	osc27M: osc {
> +		compatible = "fixed-clock";
> +		clock-frequency = <27000000>;
> +		clock-output-names = "osc27M";
> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> +	};
> +
> +	rbus: r-bus@98000000 {
> +		compatible = "simple-bus";
> +		#address-cells = <1>;
> +		#size-cells = <1>;
> +		ranges = <0x98000000 0x0 0x98000000 0x200000>;

This was not what I meant. I realize my indentation may have been
ambiguous there, one level too little. The idea was to keep the soc
node, extend it with ranges and without the soc node have an r-bus node
(or rbus?) that allows us to unify the addressing. Please compare my
RTD1395 patchset and leave inline comments. One issue I see is that
we're seeing wildly different sizes for r-bus depending on where we look
- 0x70000, 0x100000, 0x200000, 0x1000000, ... Please double-check both
here and in my patches.

> +
> +		uart0: serial0@98007800 {
> +			compatible = "snps,dw-apb-uart";
> +			reg = <0x98007800 0x400>;
> +			reg-shift = <2>;
> +			reg-io-width = <4>;
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 68 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			clock-frequency = <27000000>;
> +			status = "disabled";
> +		};
> +
> +		uart1: serial1@9801b200 {
> +			compatible = "snps,dw-apb-uart";
> +			reg = <0x9801b200 0x400>;
> +			reg-shift = <2>;
> +			reg-io-width = <4>;
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 89 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			clock-frequency = <432000000>;
> +			status = "disabled";
> +		};
> +
> +		uart2: serial2@9801b400 {
> +			compatible = "snps,dw-apb-uart";
> +			reg = <0x9801b400 0x400>;
> +			reg-shift = <2>;
> +			reg-io-width = <4>;
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 90 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			clock-frequency = <432000000>;
> +			status = "disabled";
> +		};

Thanks for adding these.

> +	};
> +
> +	gic: interrupt-controller@ff100000 {
> +		compatible = "arm,gic-v3";
> +		reg = <0x0 0xff100000 0x0 0x10000>,
> +		      <0x0 0xff140000 0x0 0xc0000>;
> +		interrupt-controller;
> +		#interrupt-cells = <3>;
> +		interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +	};
> +};
> +
> +&arm_pmu {
> +	interrupt-affinity = <&cpu0>, <&cpu1>, <&cpu2>,
> +		<&cpu3>, <&cpu4>, <&cpu5>;
> +};

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel