From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com (=?utf-8?B?U8O2cmVu?= Brinkmann) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 09:07:02 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: zynq: DT: Add CAN node In-Reply-To: <52d799e17cd3539713625c6f6a6666620f52d692.1406120732.git.michal.simek@xilinx.com> References: <52d799e17cd3539713625c6f6a6666620f52d692.1406120732.git.michal.simek@xilinx.com> Message-ID: <0a68731a-e0f0-4e19-b9a4-57cec4c8de3b@BN1BFFO11FD048.protection.gbl> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 03:05PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote: > Add node describing Zynq's CAN controller. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Simek > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi | 13 ++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi > index 366ca6434f54..2287d9b4ed1a 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi > @@ -71,7 +71,18 @@ > interrupts = <0 7 4>; > interrupt-parent = <&intc>; > clocks = <&clkc 12>; > - }; > + }; > + > + can0: can at e0008000 { > + compatible = "xlnx,zynq-can-1.0"; > + clocks = <&clkc 19>, <&clkc 36>; > + clock-names = "can_clk", "pclk"; > + reg = <0xe0008000 0x1000>; > + interrupts = <0 28 4>; > + interrupt-parent = <&intc>; > + tx-fifo-depth = <0x40>; > + rx-fifo-depth = <0x40>; > + }; What about the second CAN core? You also probably want to add 'status = "disabled"' in the dtsi. S?ren