From: sudeep.holla@arm.com (Sudeep Holla)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM64 / cpuidle: Use new cpuidle macro for entering retention state
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:33:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0b4b13d3-2415-33df-f02b-1c94df4331ea@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1510187922-8218-3-git-send-email-pprakash@codeaurora.org>
On 09/11/17 00:38, Prashanth Prakash wrote:
> CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_RETENTION skips calling cpu_pm_enter() and
> cpu_pm_exit(). By not calling cpu_pm functions in idle entry/exit
> paths we can reduce the latency involved in entering and exiting
> the low power idle state.
>
> On ARM64 based Qualcomm server platform we measured below overhead
> for calling cpu_pm_enter and cpu_pm_exit for retention states.
>
> workload: stress --hdd #CPUs --hdd-bytes 32M -t 30
> Average overhead of cpu_pm_enter - 1.2us
> Average overhead of cpu_pm_exit - 3.1us
>
> Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c
> index fd69108..f2d1381 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ int arm_cpuidle_suspend(int index)
>
> #include <acpi/processor.h>
>
> +#define ARM64_LPI_IS_RETENTION_STATE(arch_flags) (!(arch_flags))
> +
This is fine, but just to be safer, is it better to check for all
flags to be set as we can't/don't support any partial retention modes.
Just curious, how is retention handled on mobile parts. I guess mainline
is not important on those parts, but add a note in the commit message
that we can make it ACPI agnostic and PSCI param dependent if needed.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-13 12:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-09 0:38 [PATCH v2 0/2] Avoid calling cpu_pm functions for retention idle states Prashanth Prakash
2017-11-09 0:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] cpuidle: Add new macro to enter a retention idle state Prashanth Prakash
2017-11-13 12:27 ` Sudeep Holla
2017-11-09 0:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM64 / cpuidle: Use new cpuidle macro for entering retention state Prashanth Prakash
2017-11-13 12:33 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2017-11-14 16:15 ` Prakash, Prashanth
2017-11-14 17:40 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0b4b13d3-2415-33df-f02b-1c94df4331ea@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).