linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc.Zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [BUG] "sched: Remove rq->lock from the first half of ttwu()" locks up on ARM
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 17:22:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1306426948.27474.243.camel@e102391-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1306426148.2497.83.camel@laptop>

On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 18:09 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 17:59 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 17:45 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > Stupid question. Can't we fix this problem if we do
> > > 
> > >         -       if (p == current)
> > >         +       if (cpu == raw_smp_processor_id())
> > > 
> > > ?
> > > 
> > > I forgot the rules... but iirc task_cpu(p) can't be changed under us?
> > 
> > Easy enough to test.. brain gave out again,. hold on ;-)
> 
> The below seems to run all-right so far, I'll let it run for a while.

Just got the following:

INFO: task kjournald:904 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
kjournald       D c0284c88     0   904      2 0x00000000
[<c0284c88>] (schedule+0x54c/0x620) from [<c0284dd8>] (io_schedule+0x7c/0xac)
[<c0284dd8>] (io_schedule+0x7c/0xac) from [<c00dc1c0>] (sleep_on_buffer+0x8/0x10)
[<c00dc1c0>] (sleep_on_buffer+0x8/0x10) from [<c02854ac>] (__wait_on_bit+0x54/0x9c)
[<c02854ac>] (__wait_on_bit+0x54/0x9c) from [<c028556c>] (out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x78/0x84)
[<c028556c>] (out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x78/0x84) from [<c014bc4c>] (journal_commit_transaction+0x734/0x13f4)
[<c014bc4c>] (journal_commit_transaction+0x734/0x13f4) from [<c014f598>] (kjournald+0xb8/0x210)
[<c014f598>] (kjournald+0xb8/0x210) from [<c0066320>] (kthread+0x80/0x88)
[<c0066320>] (kthread+0x80/0x88) from [<c002ea14>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)

	M.
-- 
Reality is an implementation detail.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-05-26 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-24 18:13 [BUG] "sched: Remove rq->lock from the first half of ttwu()" locks up on ARM Marc Zyngier
2011-05-24 21:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-24 21:39   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-25 12:23     ` Marc Zyngier
2011-05-25 17:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-25 21:15     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26  7:29       ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-26 10:32         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26 11:02           ` Marc Zyngier
2011-05-26 11:32             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26 12:21               ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26 12:26                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-26 12:31                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-26 12:37                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26 12:50                     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-26 13:36                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-26 14:45                       ` Catalin Marinas
2011-05-27 12:06                         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-27 17:55                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-27 19:41                           ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-05-27 20:52                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-28 13:13                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-31 11:08                               ` Michal Simek
2011-05-31 13:22                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-31 13:37                                   ` Michal Simek
2011-05-31 13:52                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-31 14:08                                       ` Michal Simek
2011-05-31 14:29                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-29 10:21                             ` Catalin Marinas
2011-05-29 10:26                               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-29 12:01                                 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-05-29 13:19                                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-29 21:21                                     ` Catalin Marinas
2011-05-29  9:51                           ` Catalin Marinas
2011-06-06 10:29                           ` Pavel Machek
2011-05-26 14:56                 ` Marc Zyngier
2011-05-26 15:45                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-26 15:59                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26 16:09                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26 16:20                       ` Marc Zyngier
2011-05-26 16:32                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-27  8:01                           ` Marc Zyngier
2011-05-26 16:22                       ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2011-05-26 17:04                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-26 17:17                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26 17:23                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26 17:49                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-27  7:01                             ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-27 15:23                             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-05-27 15:29                               ` Marc Zyngier
2011-05-27 15:30                                 ` Santosh Shilimkar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1306426948.27474.243.camel@e102391-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).