linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: peterz@infradead.org (Peter Zijlstra)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [BUG] "sched: Remove rq->lock from the first half of ttwu()" locks up on ARM
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 15:52:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1306849951.2353.108.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DE4EF1B.80805@monstr.eu>

On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 15:37 +0200, Michal Simek wrote:

> I briefly looked at it and it probably come from copy_thread function (process.c 
> - line: childregs->msr |= MSR_IE;)
> When context switch happen, childregs->msr value is loaded to MSR (machine 
> status register) which caused that IE is enabled ( entry.S:~977 lwi	r12, r11, 
> CC_MSR; 	mts	rmsr, r12)
> 
> NOTE: MSR stores flags for IE, i/d-cache ON/OFF, virtual memory/user mode etc.
> 
> This is no problem if context switch is done with irq on. But maybe there is 
> another place which is causing some problems.

Ahh, no wonder I didn't find that ;-)

> Where exactly should be IRQ reenable after context switch?

the tail end of finish_lock_switch(), where it does:
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock).

> I would like to also check some things.
> 1. When schedule should be called from arch specific code?
> Currently we are calling schedule after syscall/exception/interrupt happen.
> Is there any place where schedule should/shouldn't be called?

It should be called on the return to userspace path when
TIF_NEED_RESCHED is set. It should not be called from non-preemptible
contexts like non-zero preempt_count or IRQ-disabled.

[ with the exception of CONFIG_PREEMPT which calls preempt_schedule()
which checks both those things ]

> 2. For syscall and exception handling - interrupt is ON but it is only masked.

I'm having trouble understanding: on but masked.

> When schedule is called from that any code has to enable IRQ if generic code 
> doesn't do that. Not sure if it does.

generic code isn't supposed to call schedule() with IRQs disabled (and
doesn't afaik)

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-31 13:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-24 18:13 [BUG] "sched: Remove rq->lock from the first half of ttwu()" locks up on ARM Marc Zyngier
2011-05-24 21:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-24 21:39   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-25 12:23     ` Marc Zyngier
2011-05-25 17:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-25 21:15     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26  7:29       ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-26 10:32         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26 11:02           ` Marc Zyngier
2011-05-26 11:32             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26 12:21               ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26 12:26                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-26 12:31                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-26 12:37                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26 12:50                     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-26 13:36                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-26 14:45                       ` Catalin Marinas
2011-05-27 12:06                         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-27 17:55                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-27 19:41                           ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-05-27 20:52                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-28 13:13                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-31 11:08                               ` Michal Simek
2011-05-31 13:22                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-31 13:37                                   ` Michal Simek
2011-05-31 13:52                                     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-05-31 14:08                                       ` Michal Simek
2011-05-31 14:29                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-29 10:21                             ` Catalin Marinas
2011-05-29 10:26                               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-29 12:01                                 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-05-29 13:19                                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-29 21:21                                     ` Catalin Marinas
2011-05-29  9:51                           ` Catalin Marinas
2011-06-06 10:29                           ` Pavel Machek
2011-05-26 14:56                 ` Marc Zyngier
2011-05-26 15:45                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-26 15:59                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26 16:09                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26 16:20                       ` Marc Zyngier
2011-05-26 16:32                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-27  8:01                           ` Marc Zyngier
2011-05-26 16:22                       ` Marc Zyngier
2011-05-26 17:04                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-26 17:17                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26 17:23                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26 17:49                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-27  7:01                             ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-27 15:23                             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-05-27 15:29                               ` Marc Zyngier
2011-05-27 15:30                                 ` Santosh Shilimkar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1306849951.2353.108.camel@twins \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).