From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wens@csie.org (Chen-Yu Tsai) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 01:24:37 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: sunxi: number gpio ranges starting from 0 In-Reply-To: <1405358677-23657-1-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> References: <1405358677-23657-1-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> Message-ID: <1405358677-23657-3-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org The pinctrl-sunxi driver originally used the pin number as the gpio range offset. This resulted in large, bogus gpio numbers for the new sun6i-a31-r pinctrl devices. This patch makes the driver number the gpios ranges starting from an offset of 0, by subtracting the pin_base number from the pin number. This also makes the system-wide gpio number match the pin number. Tested on sun8i with sysfs exported gpios. Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai --- This patch also changes the GPIO bindings for R_PIO: gpios = <&r_pio B N flag>; Where B originally was the pinbank label (L or M) counted from A, with this patch it becomes (L or M) counted from its pinbank base (L). Thus gpios = <&r_pio 10 11 0>; /* PL11 */ becomes gpios = <&r_pio 0 11 0>; /* PL11 */ IMO this is correct, as the binding shows the bank offset and pin offset within the bank for the GPIO controller. But I'm worried it might be a bit confusing. --- drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c | 13 ++++++++----- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c index 23c1b9f..de4fb06 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c @@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ static int sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_of_xlate(struct gpio_chip *gc, base = PINS_PER_BANK * gpiospec->args[0]; pin = base + gpiospec->args[1]; - if (pin > (gc->base + gc->ngpio)) + if (pin > gc->ngpio) return -EINVAL; if (flags) @@ -520,12 +520,13 @@ static int sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset) { struct sunxi_pinctrl *pctl = dev_get_drvdata(chip->dev); struct sunxi_desc_function *desc; + unsigned pinnum = pctl->desc->pin_base + offset; unsigned irqnum; if (offset >= chip->ngpio) return -ENXIO; - desc = sunxi_pinctrl_desc_find_function_by_pin(pctl, offset, "irq"); + desc = sunxi_pinctrl_desc_find_function_by_pin(pctl, pinnum, "irq"); if (!desc) return -EINVAL; @@ -548,7 +549,8 @@ static int sunxi_pinctrl_irq_request_resources(struct irq_data *d) if (!func) return -EINVAL; - ret = gpio_lock_as_irq(pctl->chip, pctl->irq_array[d->hwirq]); + ret = gpio_lock_as_irq(pctl->chip, + pctl->irq_array[d->hwirq] - pctl->desc->pin_base); if (ret) { dev_err(pctl->dev, "unable to lock HW IRQ %lu for IRQ\n", irqd_to_hwirq(d)); @@ -565,7 +567,8 @@ static void sunxi_pinctrl_irq_release_resources(struct irq_data *d) { struct sunxi_pinctrl *pctl = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); - gpio_unlock_as_irq(pctl->chip, pctl->irq_array[d->hwirq]); + gpio_unlock_as_irq(pctl->chip, + pctl->irq_array[d->hwirq] - pctl->desc->pin_base); } static int sunxi_pinctrl_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type) @@ -931,7 +934,7 @@ int sunxi_pinctrl_init(struct platform_device *pdev, const struct sunxi_desc_pin *pin = pctl->desc->pins + i; ret = gpiochip_add_pin_range(pctl->chip, dev_name(&pdev->dev), - pin->pin.number, + pin->pin.number - pctl->desc->pin_base, pin->pin.number, 1); if (ret) goto gpiochip_error; -- 2.0.1