From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khalid.aziz@oracle.com (Khalid Aziz) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 07:52:25 -0700 Subject: linux-next: Tree for Nov 7 In-Reply-To: <20171114090444.lhrkuywuls26g6lu@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20171107162217.382cd754@canb.auug.org.au> <20171108142050.7w3yliulxjeco3b7@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20171110123054.5pnefm3mczsfv7bz@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20171113092006.cjw2njjukt6limvb@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20171113094203.aofz2e7kueitk55y@dhcp22.suse.cz> <87lgjawgx1.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> <20171113120057.555mvrs4fjq5tyng@dhcp22.suse.cz> <87h8txw87w.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> <20171114090444.lhrkuywuls26g6lu@dhcp22.suse.cz> Message-ID: <1510671145.4344.1.camel@oracle.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 10:04 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > If there is a general consensus that this is the preferred way to go, > I > will post the patch as an RFC to linux-api > > [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171113160637.jhekbdyfpccme3be at dhcp22.s > use.cz I prefer the new flag. It is cleaner and avoids unintended breakage for existing flag. -- Khalid