From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Okamoto Takayuki" <tokamoto@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"Christoffer Dall" <cdall@kernel.org>,
"Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
"Marc Zyngier" <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 15/24] KVM: arm64: Reject ioctl access to FPSIMD V-regs on SVE vcpus
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 23:28:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1544570941-7377-16-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1544570941-7377-1-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>
In order to avoid the pointless complexity of maintaining two ioctl
register access views of the same data, this patch blocks ioctl
access to the FPSIMD V-registers on vcpus that support SVE.
This will make it more straightforward to add SVE register access
support.
Since SVE is an opt-in feature for userspace, this will not affect
existing users.
Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
---
Changes since RFC v2:
* New patch
The initial code was split from "KVM: arm64/sve: Add SVE support to
register access ioctl interface". However, some additional
refactoring makes this change quite noisy: for ease of review,
I decided it was best to keep the two parts of the change separate.
* Move core_reg_offset_is_vreg() before validate_core_reg_id()
(which now makes use of it).
* Move rejection of KVM_REG_ARM_CORE view of the FPSIMD V-regs on
SVE-enabled vcpus into validate_core_reg_id(), so that it can be
applied everywhere appropriate instead of being open-coded.
This requires vcpu to be pushed down into a few code paths
(This is the noise alluded to above).
---
arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
index 0bf0ed3..e1ea73e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
@@ -83,7 +83,13 @@ static int core_reg_size_from_offset(u64 off)
return -EINVAL;
}
-static int validate_core_reg_id(u64 id)
+static bool core_reg_offset_is_vreg(u64 off)
+{
+ return off >= KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.vregs) &&
+ off < KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.fpsr);
+}
+
+static int validate_core_reg_id(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id)
{
u64 off = core_reg_offset_from_id(id);
int size = core_reg_size_from_offset(off);
@@ -91,10 +97,18 @@ static int validate_core_reg_id(u64 id)
if (size < 0)
return size;
- if (KVM_REG_SIZE(id) == size && IS_ALIGNED(off, size / sizeof(__u32)))
- return 0;
+ if (KVM_REG_SIZE(id) != size || !IS_ALIGNED(off, size / sizeof(__u32)))
+ return -EINVAL;
- return -EINVAL;
+ /*
+ * The KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE regs must be used instead of
+ * KVM_REG_ARM_CORE for accessing the FPSIMD V-registers on
+ * SVE-enabled vcpus:
+ */
+ if (vcpu_has_sve(vcpu) && core_reg_offset_is_vreg(off))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ return 0;
}
static int get_core_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
@@ -116,7 +130,7 @@ static int get_core_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
(off + (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) / sizeof(__u32))) >= nr_regs)
return -ENOENT;
- if (validate_core_reg_id(reg->id))
+ if (validate_core_reg_id(vcpu, reg->id))
return -EINVAL;
if (copy_to_user(uaddr, ((u32 *)regs) + off, KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id)))
@@ -141,7 +155,7 @@ static int set_core_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
(off + (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) / sizeof(__u32))) >= nr_regs)
return -ENOENT;
- if (validate_core_reg_id(reg->id))
+ if (validate_core_reg_id(vcpu, reg->id))
return -EINVAL;
if (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) > sizeof(tmp))
@@ -194,7 +208,8 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_regs *regs)
return -EINVAL;
}
-static int copy_core_reg_indices(u64 __user **uind)
+static int copy_core_reg_indices(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ u64 __user **uind)
{
unsigned int i;
int total = 0;
@@ -228,7 +243,7 @@ static int copy_core_reg_indices(u64 __user **uind)
break;
}
- if (validate_core_reg_id(id))
+ if (validate_core_reg_id(vcpu, id))
continue;
if (uind) {
@@ -243,9 +258,9 @@ static int copy_core_reg_indices(u64 __user **uind)
return total;
}
-static unsigned long num_core_regs(void)
+static unsigned long num_core_regs(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- return copy_core_reg_indices(NULL);
+ return copy_core_reg_indices(vcpu, NULL);
}
/**
@@ -310,7 +325,7 @@ unsigned long kvm_arm_num_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
unsigned long res = 0;
- res += num_core_regs();
+ res += num_core_regs(vcpu);
res += kvm_arm_num_sys_reg_descs(vcpu);
res += kvm_arm_get_fw_num_regs(vcpu);
res += NUM_TIMER_REGS;
@@ -327,7 +342,7 @@ int kvm_arm_copy_reg_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uindices)
{
int ret;
- ret = copy_core_reg_indices(&uindices);
+ ret = copy_core_reg_indices(vcpu, &uindices);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
--
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-11 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-11 23:28 [RFC PATCH v3 00/24] KVM: arm64: SVE guest support Dave Martin
2018-12-11 23:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/24] arm64: fpsimd: Always set TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE on task state flush Dave Martin
2018-12-11 23:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/24] KVM: arm64: Delete orphaned declaration for __fpsimd_enabled() Dave Martin
2018-12-11 23:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/24] KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_arm_num_regs() for easier maintenance Dave Martin
2018-12-11 23:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/24] KVM: arm64: Add missing #include of <linux/bitmap.h> to kvm_host.h Dave Martin
2018-12-11 23:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/24] arm64/sve: Check SVE virtualisability Dave Martin
2018-12-11 23:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/24] arm64/sve: Clarify role of the VQ map maintenance functions Dave Martin
2018-12-11 23:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/24] arm64/sve: Enable SVE state tracking for non-task contexts Dave Martin
2018-12-11 23:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/24] KVM: arm64: Add a vcpu flag to control SVE visibility for the guest Dave Martin
2018-12-11 23:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/24] KVM: arm64: Propagate vcpu into read_id_reg() Dave Martin
2018-12-11 23:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/24] KVM: arm64: Extend reset_unknown() to handle mixed RES0/UNKNOWN registers Dave Martin
2018-12-11 23:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/24] KVM: arm64: Support runtime sysreg filtering for KVM_GET_REG_LIST Dave Martin
2018-12-11 23:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/24] KVM: arm64/sve: System register context switch and access support Dave Martin
2018-12-11 23:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/24] KVM: arm64/sve: Context switch the SVE registers Dave Martin
2018-12-11 23:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 14/24] KVM: Allow 2048-bit register access via ioctl interface Dave Martin
2018-12-11 23:28 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2018-12-11 23:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 16/24] KVM: arm64/sve: Add SVE support to register access " Dave Martin
2018-12-11 23:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 17/24] KVM: arm64: Enumerate SVE register indices for KVM_GET_REG_LIST Dave Martin
2018-12-11 23:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 18/24] arm64/sve: In-kernel vector length availability query interface Dave Martin
2018-12-11 23:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 19/24] KVM: arm: Move detection of invalid VM type bits to generic code Dave Martin
2018-12-11 23:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 20/24] KVM: arm: Add support for early vcpu configuration ioctls Dave Martin
2018-12-11 23:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 21/24] KVM: arm64/sve: Report and enable SVE API extensions for userspace Dave Martin
2018-12-11 23:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 22/24] KVM: arm64/sve: allow KVM_ARM_SVE_CONFIG_QUERY on vm fd Dave Martin
2018-12-11 23:29 ` [RFC PATCH v3 23/24] KVM: Documentation: Document arm64 core registers in detail Dave Martin
2018-12-11 23:29 ` [RFC PATCH v3 24/24] KVM: arm64/sve: Document KVM API extensions for SVE Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1544570941-7377-16-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--to=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cdall@kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=tokamoto@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).