From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,UNWANTED_LANGUAGE_BODY,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB80C43387 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:57:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CB6320851 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:57:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="JSo9adJg" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5CB6320851 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References: In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=XIi55+J0mfHbw1SpE0/+m313sfZgQZNkYfJVgCapTxM=; b=JSo9adJgCd/iHXSkh+qiNJh9j4 UG+X1wxJcD/Q0YlbNmsNIBFBHaaPmeIctHho+FR5mKqIUpw0/yx9V/mxC7GA/41w4w24na9Lzw5zr 2KYDnFcTl9hDJc7IEdN1vY3uBsfH9gu+APdxU+qZFgfEDklMb92k7EbfSkrJgyHGlSCm8GF/K8cBO h1FiRI3T1XOOxrCQk+XXUKSeToTX2LCf6AzL/nJ7uHj3hiTYui1gO2TTI64hvT3RtHIokxpxQZA1E Tc7Wi+dU09u74DrjSHLUFedabHzl6PEsLJRr78lWot1p0GYbPscSGFxFldiF0nlkVNxibLzZqYnl1 hbFW6Rag==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gkEQQ-0004JK-G1; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:38:06 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gkENT-0000Pf-JY for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:35:41 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D57B1684; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 12:35:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from e103592.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 40B333F819; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 12:35:01 -0800 (PST) From: Dave Martin To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [PATCH v4 16/25] KVM: arm64: Reject ioctl access to FPSIMD V-regs on SVE vcpus Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:33:30 +0000 Message-Id: <1547757219-19439-17-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.1.4 In-Reply-To: <1547757219-19439-1-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com> References: <1547757219-19439-1-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190117_123504_871491_05222029 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.54 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Okamoto Takayuki , Christoffer Dall , Ard Biesheuvel , Marc Zyngier , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Julien Grall , =?UTF-8?q?Alex=20Benn=C3=A9e?= , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org In order to avoid the pointless complexity of maintaining two ioctl register access views of the same data, this patch blocks ioctl access to the FPSIMD V-registers on vcpus that support SVE. This will make it more straightforward to add SVE register access support. Since SVE is an opt-in feature for userspace, this will not affect existing users. Signed-off-by: Dave Martin --- arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c index 65f4338..ffa38d4 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c @@ -94,7 +94,14 @@ static int core_reg_size_from_offset(u64 off) return -EINVAL; } -static int validate_core_offset(const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) +static bool core_reg_offset_is_vreg(u64 off) +{ + return off >= KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.vregs) && + off < KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.fpsr); +} + +static int validate_core_offset(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) { u64 off = core_reg_offset_from_id(reg->id); int size = core_reg_size_from_offset(off); @@ -102,10 +109,18 @@ static int validate_core_offset(const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) if (size < 0) return -EINVAL; - if (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) == size) - return 0; + if (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) != size) + return -EINVAL; - return -EINVAL; + /* + * The KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE regs must be used instead of + * KVM_REG_ARM_CORE for accessing the FPSIMD V-registers on + * SVE-enabled vcpus: + */ + if (vcpu_has_sve(vcpu) && core_reg_offset_is_vreg(off)) + return -EINVAL; + + return 0; } static int get_core_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) @@ -127,7 +142,7 @@ static int get_core_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) (off + (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) / sizeof(__u32))) >= nr_regs) return -ENOENT; - if (validate_core_offset(reg)) + if (validate_core_offset(vcpu, reg)) return -EINVAL; if (copy_to_user(uaddr, ((u32 *)regs) + off, KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id))) @@ -152,7 +167,7 @@ static int set_core_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) (off + (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) / sizeof(__u32))) >= nr_regs) return -ENOENT; - if (validate_core_offset(reg)) + if (validate_core_offset(vcpu, reg)) return -EINVAL; if (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) > sizeof(tmp)) @@ -205,7 +220,8 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_regs *regs) return -EINVAL; } -static int copy_core_reg_indices(u64 __user **uind) +static int copy_core_reg_indices(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + u64 __user **uind) { unsigned int i; int n = 0; @@ -247,9 +263,9 @@ static int copy_core_reg_indices(u64 __user **uind) return n; } -static unsigned long num_core_regs(void) +static unsigned long num_core_regs(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { - return copy_core_reg_indices(NULL); + return copy_core_reg_indices(vcpu, NULL); } /** @@ -314,7 +330,7 @@ unsigned long kvm_arm_num_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { unsigned long res = 0; - res += num_core_regs(); + res += num_core_regs(vcpu); res += kvm_arm_num_sys_reg_descs(vcpu); res += kvm_arm_get_fw_num_regs(vcpu); res += NUM_TIMER_REGS; @@ -331,7 +347,7 @@ int kvm_arm_copy_reg_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uindices) { int ret; - ret = copy_core_reg_indices(&uindices); + ret = copy_core_reg_indices(vcpu, &uindices); if (ret < 0) return ret; -- 2.1.4 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel