[PATCH v5 19/26] KVM: arm64: Enumerate SVE register indices for KVM_GET_REG_LIST

[Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>]

This patch includes the SVE register IDs in the list returned by
KVM_GET_REG_LIST, as appropriate.

On a non-SVE-enabled vcpu, no new IDs are added.

On an SVE-enabled vcpu, IDs for the FPSIMD V-registers are removed
from the list, since userspace is required to access the Z-
registers instead to access their context.  For the variably-sized
SVE registers, the appropriate set of slice IDs are enumerated,
depending on the maximum vector length for the vcpu.

Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>

---

Changes since v4:

 * Drop KVM_SVE_SLICES(), which is no longer used due to the dropping of
   register multi-slice support from the series.

 * Drop register multi-slice support.
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
index 8cfa889..4a2ad60 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
@@ -366,6 +366,14 @@ static int copy_core_reg_indices(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			continue;
 		}
 
+		/*
+		 * The KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE regs must be used instead of
+		 * KVM_REG_ARM_CORE for accessing the FPSIMD V-registers on
+		 * SVE-enabled vcpus:
+		 */
+		if (vcpu_has_sve(vcpu) && core_reg_offset_is_vreg(i))
+			continue;
+
 		if (uind) {
 			if (put_user(reg, *uind))
 				return -EFAULT;
@@ -436,6 +444,44 @@ static int get_timer_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
 	return copy_to_user(uaddr, &val, KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
 }
 
+static unsigned long num_sve_regs(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	/* Only the first slice ever exists, for now */
+	const unsigned int slices = 1;
+
+	if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
+		return 0;
+
+	return slices * (SVE_NUM_PREGS + SVE_NUM_ZREGS + 1 /* FFR */);
+}
+
+static int copy_sve_reg_indices(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user **uind)
+{
+	/* Only the first slice ever exists, for now */
+	const unsigned int slices = 1;
+	unsigned int i, n;
+
+	if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
+		return 0;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < slices; i++) {
+		for (n = 0; n < SVE_NUM_ZREGS; n++) {
+			if (put_user(KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_ZREG(n, i), (*uind)++))
+				return -EFAULT;
+		}
+
+		for (n = 0; n < SVE_NUM_PREGS; n++) {
+			if (put_user(KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_PREG(n, i), (*uind)++))
+				return -EFAULT;
+		}
+
+		if (put_user(KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_FFR(i), (*uind)++))
+			return -EFAULT;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /**
  * kvm_arm_num_regs - how many registers do we present via KVM_GET_ONE_REG
  *
@@ -446,6 +492,7 @@ unsigned long kvm_arm_num_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	unsigned long res = 0;
 
 	res += num_core_regs(vcpu);
+	res += num_sve_regs(vcpu);
 	res += kvm_arm_num_sys_reg_descs(vcpu);
 	res += kvm_arm_get_fw_num_regs(vcpu);
 	res += NUM_TIMER_REGS;
@@ -466,6 +513,10 @@ int kvm_arm_copy_reg_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uindices)
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
+	ret = copy_sve_reg_indices(vcpu, &uindices);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	ret = kvm_arm_copy_fw_reg_indices(vcpu, uindices);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
-- 
2.1.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel