From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFAADC4360F for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 07:48:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 908092086C for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 07:48:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="gH4Asx03"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="mHvlPgvX" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 908092086C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Date:To:In-Reply-To:From:References: Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=PTnlRADAMuuVx99GZQpWGUabgYPNhpbe0JKSYH8K4R4=; b=gH4Asx03lk45ZC o7njc3uNCGFk0E/hOltCNqEjqCp1nTZj9NRYtKgxFfnc119wotgdTxy8PS3xFytUiG4WuL/Yv1xKj 7+ydg2aFPJzLF/3YUkvlL6cbsuL6occz5Wxt9UM09Lumjv+8rjXQBR4E7Cu0GCki+RP+tBpOUl7gy Zc0eNv2gtidWaUFMwsyLp6wwSLdWH5GdXV88AP589i6Z6mix2ztPewv22cvSSeRGY6Bmwe1+VC7RR +mdQf4m9cL+itewTx0eWGafp3XWXIrggegLIkHnQbsR+CwuZK2vtnBzbAM1EPFLecdW4jvElAU2n0 eaVztUERNjptMX9pMKJw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gx5Z7-0004ix-K5; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 07:48:13 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gx5Z4-0004ib-KQ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 07:48:11 +0000 Received: from localhost (unknown [104.132.0.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF37D207E0; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 07:48:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1550821689; bh=IWsGKyF6tSaXeD7/EpbCy6bONxy5c7yvq1SKZiasmCs=; h=Subject:References:From:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:Date:From; b=mHvlPgvXH8lhnQQ1MiSPkgg8nvk+Zdl0Mb0WdNqeFG4q1IHioJEte91aC+pPZ97FA pg7IaKaMq3tF5+/fx2rP08nVw3X2Jkeg5EHZt2el9yPHz8pDT7tcbuL3eS0UbK1okE Zr4iYUnV64ou6Om4hls2Zp0t6SKvB59wHEJm2U44= MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] Mediatek MT8183 clock and scpsys support Message-ID: <155082168901.77512.12893153125579041936@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> User-Agent: alot/0.8 References: <20190201083016.25856-1-weiyi.lu@mediatek.com> <20190201083016.25856-2-weiyi.lu@mediatek.com> <155069033021.77512.14493210110678229730@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> From: Stephen Boyd In-Reply-To: To: Matthias Brugger , Nicolas Boichat , Rob Herring , Stephen Boyd , Weiyi Lu Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 23:48:09 -0800 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190221_234810_686837_0F5D1F0D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.45 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: James Liao , srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Fan Chen , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Quoting Matthias Brugger (2019-02-21 00:36:24) > > > On 20/02/2019 20:18, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > What's the merge plan here? Do you want me to apply these patches to clk > > tree? Will someone be sending me a pull request for mediatek clk changes > > this cycle? It's getting pretty late for much of anything making this > > upcoming merge window. > > > > As far as I can see, the clock patches are independent, so I think it is OK to > take them. SCPSYS patches will go through my tree once they are in shape. Ok great. When patches for clks are interspersed throughout the patch series it makes me think that something later in the series depends on something that isn't a clk patch so then I can't apply it. > > Do you prefer to get pull requests for clock patches? I wasn't aware of that. > But if you prefer that, we can find someone who prepares every merge window a > pull request. > I don't really care one way or the other about pull requests vs. manually applying patches. It helps if someone wants to pick the patches up and send them along when there are complex dependencies between the clk patches and dts bits or something like that. It also helps if there's someone else with knowledge of the particular SoC saying "these are good, please pull these patches". Subsystem maintainers obviously aren't experts in all SoCs and their various quirks, plus datasheets aren't always so widely available, so sharing the load with SoC maintainers who are familiar with the hardware usually makes a lot of sense. Otherwise, if you just want to put your "Reviewed-by" tag on any patches that look good and are sane then I'll quickly understand that these patches are good and that I should pick them up into the clk tree from the list. Just please communicate one way or the other about patches that you care about because it helps to know if they've gotten attention or not. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel