From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04AD7C34031 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 04:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B95DE20801 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 04:22:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="OAYzL2NW"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=mediatek.com header.i=@mediatek.com header.b="meGckE/R" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B95DE20801 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=mediatek.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=XtWZBj+lv6bA2RcVhKj0ieBx5LRFkVuRjpgKGapbYFc=; b=OAYzL2NWqGAFP0 qpqg/ocoiJjrruTKUp/tHhap5FK3hS7BsLRc/om+l5fJRgbTxfYucl0xjRTfdaCI2gbgNypcm1eX7 eeiVTZOkWX5iYz7z2Tg0S4Um0HFw01jCd3HwKJae7SFV1FxIKeyGaHRTmZsPrsePKJqspyp8OseuT MKhuSKeH8Xyx7tqtVYIKBuCsk9Q+JWJyfo/yHzREAAPBkT5mVXahlQFO9L9jXbRDbsWp3Q8yeRCBc 69UwmgXkYh4WV7ITSeXtENlXVf0AT78yH6z2MgwvlPFJadY4xRrnFrlmmXrlQ1h2u1HenuHPW0mzc eogpolghsmf/FwPsqzMg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j3uP4-0005bg-Jj; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 04:22:34 +0000 Received: from mailgw02.mediatek.com ([216.200.240.185]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j3uOz-0005aO-2v; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 04:22:31 +0000 X-UUID: a763f1c528ff4016a936ce9ef81dc152-20200217 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mediatek.com; s=dk; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:CC:To:From:Subject:Message-ID; bh=sC1dH8d6p1Sb7KU8Fpm99duFBOtY/J9QQu2NqxSwvKI=; b=meGckE/RlG4C4gn9SvGq8p7btegtkWaCNAgOrHGz5uXE/hPuHn/nEmO/H6Kv4baV/2NN3DNL1UaM1l9a7y41uXPsT1YJYIBBgT6EWqymZ870u0XJJDg60VTd137oQo11g/9CSPeQ+bxQKfpnEI4WlITaUr09aIK66rqrIoYuvD8=; X-UUID: a763f1c528ff4016a936ce9ef81dc152-20200217 Received: from mtkcas66.mediatek.inc [(172.29.193.44)] by mailgw02.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (musrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLS) with ESMTP id 931175499; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 20:22:22 -0800 Received: from MTKMBS02N2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.101) by MTKMBS62N2.mediatek.inc (172.29.193.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 20:13:10 -0800 Received: from mtkcas07.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.84) by mtkmbs02n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 12:09:51 +0800 Received: from [172.21.77.33] (172.21.77.33) by mtkcas07.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 12:11:50 +0800 Message-ID: <1581999138.19053.21.camel@mtkswgap22> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] Add basic SoC support for mt6765 From: Macpaul Lin To: Matthias Brugger , Stephen Boyd Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 12:12:18 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <1581067250-12744-1-git-send-email-macpaul.lin@mediatek.com> <158155109134.184098.10100489231587620578@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-SNTS-SMTP: 84BB3C13CA23C8AB9C9ED080959C0C3F21F3FB9B8B07A59D24DCEF47D5C4BF1C2000:8 X-MTK: N X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200217_202229_137742_D297BD93 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.62 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Mediatek WSD Upstream , Catalin Marinas , Michael Turquette , Loda Chou , Fabien Parent , Mars Cheng , Will Deacon , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Ryder Lee , Weiyi Lu , Evan Green , Yong Wu , Chunfeng Yun , mtk01761 , Owen Chen , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel , Marc Zyngier , Sean Wang , Rob Herring , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, CC Hwang , Stephen Boyd , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shawn Guo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sat, 2020-02-15 at 02:47 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote: Hi Stephen, > Hi Stephen, > > On 13/02/2020 00:44, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Macpaul Lin (2020-02-07 01:20:43) > >> This patch adds basic SoC support for Mediatek's new 8-core SoC, > >> MT6765, which is mainly for smartphone application. > > > > Clock patches look OK to me. Can you resend them without the defconfig > > and dts patches and address Matthias' question? > > > > I'm not sure if I understand you. Do you prefer to have just the clock parts > send as an independent version so that you can easier apply the patches to your > tree? > > Patch 2, 5, 6 and 7 should go through my tree. > So do you want a series with patches 1, 3 and 4? > > Regards, > Matthias Yup, I've got a little bit confused, too. Should I separate and resend these patches into 2 patch sets? The 1st patch set includes #1, #3, and #4? And the other includes #2, #5, #6, and #7? Regards, Macpaul Lin _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel