Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] Add basic SoC support for mt6765

From: Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@mediatek.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Mediatek WSD Upstream <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Loda Chou <loda.chou@mediatek.com>,
	Fabien Parent <fparent@baylibre.com>,
	Mars Cheng <mars.cheng@mediatek.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Ryder Lee <Ryder.Lee@mediatek.com>,
	Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com>,
	Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>,
	mtk01761 <wendell.lin@mediatek.com>,
	Owen Chen <owen.chen@mediatek.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Sean Wang <Sean.Wang@mediatek.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>, CC Hwang <cc.hwang@mediatek.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] Add basic SoC support for mt6765
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 18:23:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1582280608.19053.27.camel@mtkswgap22> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <158213769281.184098.14491216159423631295@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>

Quoting Matthias Brugger and Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Matthias Brugger (2020-02-18 08:45:42)
> > 
> > On 18/02/2020 05:12, Macpaul Lin wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2020-02-15 at 02:47 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hi Stephen,
> > > 
> > >> Hi Stephen,
> > >>
> > >> On 13/02/2020 00:44, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > >>> Quoting Macpaul Lin (2020-02-07 01:20:43)
> > >>>> This patch adds basic SoC support for Mediatek's new 8-core SoC,
> > >>>> MT6765, which is mainly for smartphone application.
> > >>>
> > >>> Clock patches look OK to me. Can you resend them without the defconfig
> > >>> and dts patches and address Matthias' question?
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> I'm not sure if I understand you. Do you prefer to have just the clock parts
> > >> send as an independent version so that you can easier apply the patches to your
> > >> tree?
> > >>
> > >> Patch 2, 5, 6 and 7 should go through my tree.
> > >> So do you want a series with patches 1, 3 and 4?
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Matthias
> > > 
> > > Yup, I've got a little bit confused, too.
> > > Should I separate and resend these patches into 2 patch sets?
> > > The 1st patch set includes #1, #3, and #4?
> > > And the other includes #2, #5, #6, and #7?
> > > 
> > 
> > Yes please do so. I think that's what Stephen referred to.
> > 
> 
> If those are the ones that aren't dts or defconfig patches sounds good
> to me.

Here comes the spilt patch sets.
1. [New] Add basic clock support for mt6765.
  https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11395997/
2. [PATCH v8] Add basic SoC support for mt6765
  https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11396019/
  But it's a little bit strange I cannot find patch v8's cover-letter
  in patchwork. Only records which patches has been taken from v7.
  If resend cover-letter is required please let me know.

Regards,
Macpaul Lin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel