From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C791AC433DF for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 07:13:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9308E206F4 for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 07:13:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="LGFtmN13"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=mediatek.com header.i=@mediatek.com header.b="nM2kFz5w" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9308E206F4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=mediatek.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Date:To:From: Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=+QJ+bgjRrHJp1sDl/0EXeuYrUesaaqlBiGfo9wkef8A=; b=LGFtmN13n9q/ES6Z/Mq0o6yNu lcj4xPe71WpEeuwHtAqDZbPgcjJRt09h4qqTDAbOL1gVuyMR8VaaSNVfLmgWiNQjB0lVlGBki44Qz 9S01ptMYEYIzlutudkfSEiGImG5BTQe6uLef0Wi071rbm9I3xJ/koA2X/S8kbm4LZhNeurbD//4B/ qDaqp9NQb65TISs9mQS91Cb9y3qjJdPzJWG/FC5kH2t2gdrBsrfezU0rBCy2kWuTVYNnWi2XIalg9 GIZIaki+S/LWWU+e/FKqTTry5qq08PSklVMVxqqx6ujPe6/uxUiTBoUb3Wf7OE4L6m7XdRCyOcgp8 khFJors7w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ju9gT-0007dJ-Dm; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 07:12:29 +0000 Received: from mailgw02.mediatek.com ([216.200.240.185]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ju9gP-0007cV-H7; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 07:12:26 +0000 X-UUID: 309edd68a04045e7bda1e631b17aa120-20200710 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mediatek.com; s=dk; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:CC:To:From:Subject:Message-ID; bh=yilbJrHb4on0J7hThn4YoSbk9aK3TSJQjUpN3XgWrzE=; b=nM2kFz5wU1FHh9xBxJ8fOzMTcgthThfLMN3XDWrbbKOjHaLejrwZVXH/HvXFKm0R9BzLVMK6QqaOPlxvlyCHUbXhwHlTsblRY3MKb20r4cS1G4ohhtVMZ38aC3jV9lZVUcCyjA83rcnWRJRA6hRIi0QLurpnbvyN69y4mfAj9w8=; X-UUID: 309edd68a04045e7bda1e631b17aa120-20200710 Received: from mtkcas66.mediatek.inc [(172.29.193.44)] by mailgw02.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (musrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLS) with ESMTP id 657002132; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 23:12:09 -0800 Received: from MTKMBS32DR.mediatek.inc (172.27.6.104) by MTKMBS62N1.mediatek.inc (172.29.193.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 00:12:17 -0700 Received: from MTKCAS32.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.184) by MTKMBS32DR.mediatek.inc (172.27.6.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 15:12:15 +0800 Received: from [10.17.3.153] (10.17.3.153) by MTKCAS32.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.170) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 15:12:14 +0800 Message-ID: <1594451493.16172.6.camel@mhfsdcap03> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] MT6779 IOMMU SUPPORT From: Yong Wu To: Joerg Roedel Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 15:11:33 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20200710141349.GJ27672@8bytes.org> References: <20200703044127.27438-1-chao.hao@mediatek.com> <20200710141349.GJ27672@8bytes.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-SNTS-SMTP: 05BB3D50A356C307CD14C3C48E7C352C564F8EC9C54A287E85E8AED5818631902000:8 X-MTK: N X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200711_031225_788000_FD582315 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.82 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: youlin.pei@mediatek.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, FY Yang , wsd_upstream@mediatek.com, TH Yang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chao Hao , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Rob Herring , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Matthias Brugger , ming-fan.chen@mediatek.com, anan.sun@mediatek.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, 2020-07-10 at 16:13 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 12:41:17PM +0800, Chao Hao wrote: > > Chao Hao (10): > > dt-bindings: mediatek: Add bindings for MT6779 > > iommu/mediatek: Rename the register STANDARD_AXI_MODE(0x48) to MISC_CTRL > > iommu/mediatek: Use a u32 flags to describe different HW features > > iommu/mediatek: Setting MISC_CTRL register > > iommu/mediatek: Move inv_sel_reg into the plat_data > > iommu/mediatek: Add sub_comm id in translation fault > > iommu/mediatek: Add REG_MMU_WR_LEN_CTRL register definition > > iommu/mediatek: Extend protect pa alignment value > > iommu/mediatek: Modify MMU_CTRL register setting > > iommu/mediatek: Add mt6779 basic support > > Applied, thanks. Hi Joerg, Thanks for the apply. The SMI part always go with the IOMMU, Could you also help apply the mt6779 SMI basical part [1][2]. Both has already got reviewed-by from Rob and Matthias. and the [3] in that patchset is for performance improvement, it's not so necessary, it can be send in another patchset. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1176833/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1176831/ [3] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1176832/ _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel