From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAFE0C43461 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:41:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84DC621D24 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:41:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="c1Ecyo4d"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=mediatek.com header.i=@mediatek.com header.b="tREe3azI" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 84DC621D24 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=mediatek.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Date:To:From: Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=WTZPkgViybLsqFqXYMq7qS1ptaykmJDwZPJqCHYT1TM=; b=c1Ecyo4dg/NcoJHV6R/NBz1oF B+BW2GlhWkiaStEc7FsXwTSOagk3yfISUTRc/kikPkxDguov5nVmDf0Lq0JYW5ap9Z6EBunlcPirr KIwYSbx2uwD/u7u5jR2jzSENh1a74/1LPjewMUKEs5c9tKAsBJskGonzU47RaTOO/w+xoUQciLMhN UDMNBzzYnTFDIMYWjaoXsXKGna+oth6uj70l+i5zMdTTqLiSxBRYz0XYESs/5cXAvGDIxl/4P0tCI uZPdr8SHb9woV4HG4gT3NSYAx2AiDTg93pXX1CKwg3SmMaduCnZnjzWJ43szGFL/T+HIFo+BybSKb bzsomddCg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kIVmb-00077A-9F; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:39:29 +0000 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([216.200.240.184]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kIVmV-00076I-Db; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:39:26 +0000 X-UUID: e5dd9c33bc57487193d2d6f635189a1f-20200916 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mediatek.com; s=dk; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:CC:To:From:Subject:Message-ID; bh=W4f0Gv7pUKvtQ+PgBn2oCT/tUuwNvMVT9QsIDFwdjg0=; b=tREe3azI1u0MEgbt5H0hr3f29KZke4ZBJZj5JaGT+v3kP/QolKolAIg7L442D2z4O5/TEm5vMiIENcUohNUmNxaQtWj5mua/rr7vMjf074+uKEwuyYMsGmkICbqnosYdvebnaz/s6JiaLkh8ewzIM4osRYKpNY+XdBgfWqAAxHg=; X-UUID: e5dd9c33bc57487193d2d6f635189a1f-20200916 Received: from mtkcas67.mediatek.inc [(172.29.193.45)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (musrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 256/256) with ESMTP id 562569066; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 03:39:17 -0800 Received: from MTKMBS01N2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.79) by MTKMBS62DR.mediatek.inc (172.29.94.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 04:39:15 -0700 Received: from mtkcas08.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.126) by mtkmbs01n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 19:39:12 +0800 Received: from [172.21.77.33] (172.21.77.33) by mtkcas08.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 19:39:11 +0800 Message-ID: <1600256353.7042.13.camel@mtkswgap22> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for Mediatek cpufreq HW driver From: Hector Yuan To: Viresh Kumar Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 19:39:13 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20200910053406.t37rgioykzvk3oem@vireshk-i7> References: <1599712262-8819-1-git-send-email-hector.yuan@mediatek.com> <20200910050341.pgyieq3q7ijitosn@vireshk-i7> <1599715851.7042.9.camel@mtkswgap22> <20200910053406.t37rgioykzvk3oem@vireshk-i7> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-SNTS-SMTP: D31B7E4528DDBB4A6FAA5C2B85C8B1EDF1AF3454225063A0AD4497AD9E8527D22000:8 X-MTK: N X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200916_073923_655078_F110A4B1 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.95 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, wsd_upstream@mediatek.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi, Rob sir: Sorry to bother you, may I have your review comment for the binding part? Appreciated. On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 11:04 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 10-09-20, 13:30, Hector Yuan wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 10:33 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > On 10-09-20, 12:31, Hector Yuan wrote: > > > > The CPUfreq HW present in some Mediatek chipsets offloads the steps necessary for changing the frequency of CPUs. > > > > The driver implements the cpufreq driver interface for this hardware engine. > > > > > > > > This patch depends on the MT6779 DTS patch submitted by Hanks Chen > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/4/1094 > > > > > > Thanks for hanging there. Looks good to me. I will apply it once Rob > > > Ack's the binding patch. > > > > > > > Many thanks for your help. May I know if you can add Reviewed-by tag to > > this patch set. > > Since this patchset is going to get merged via my tree (ARM cpufreq > tree), a reviewed-by isn't required here. I will queue it up for > 5.10-rc1 after I receive an Ack from Rob. > > > I would like to prepare some patches for more features > > based on this. Is that okay to you? Thanks again. > > That should be fine. > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel