From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Jian Cai <jiancai@google.com>,
clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn, endif}
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:48:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <161850887861.19953.221061108559265600.b4-ty@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210414000803.662534-1-nathan@kernel.org>
On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 17:08:04 -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> After commit 2decad92f473 ("arm64: mte: Ensure TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT is
> set atomically"), LLVM's integrated assembler fails to build entry.S:
>
> <instantiation>:5:7: error: expected assembly-time absolute expression
> .org . - (664b-663b) + (662b-661b)
> ^
> <instantiation>:6:7: error: expected assembly-time absolute expression
> .org . - (662b-661b) + (664b-663b)
> ^
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/fixes), thanks!
[1/1] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn, endif}
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/22315a2296f4
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-15 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-14 0:08 [PATCH] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn, endif} Nathan Chancellor
2021-04-14 17:46 ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-14 19:22 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-04-15 9:17 ` [PATCH] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn,endif} Catalin Marinas
2021-04-15 13:25 ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-04-15 14:02 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-04-15 15:50 ` [PATCH] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn, endif} Sami Tolvanen
2021-04-15 16:57 ` [PATCH] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn,endif} Catalin Marinas
2021-04-15 17:48 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=161850887861.19953.221061108559265600.b4-ty@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=jiancai@google.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).