linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64/perf: Replace '0xf' instances with ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 10:36:38 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1628571998-13634-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> (raw)

ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF which indicate implementation defined PMU, never
actually gets used although there are '0xf' instances scattered all around.
Just do the macro replacement to improve readability.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
This applies on v5.14-rc5

 arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c      | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c               | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c           | 6 +++---
 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 9bb9d11750d7..54474e76ad86 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ cpuid_feature_cap_perfmon_field(u64 features, int field, u64 cap)
 	u64 mask = GENMASK_ULL(field + 3, field);
 
 	/* Treat IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED functionality as unimplemented */
-	if (val == 0xf)
+	if (val == ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF)
 		val = 0;
 
 	if (val > cap) {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
index d07788dad388..b4044469527e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -1055,7 +1055,7 @@ static void __armv8pmu_probe_pmu(void *info)
 	dfr0 = read_sysreg(id_aa64dfr0_el1);
 	pmuver = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(dfr0,
 			ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_SHIFT);
-	if (pmuver == 0xf || pmuver == 0)
+	if (pmuver == ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF || pmuver == 0)
 		return;
 
 	cpu_pmu->pmuver = pmuver;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c
index 151c31fb9860..f9bb3b14130e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static struct perf_guest_info_callbacks kvm_guest_cbs = {
 
 int kvm_perf_init(void)
 {
-	if (kvm_pmu_probe_pmuver() != 0xf && !is_protected_kvm_enabled())
+	if (kvm_pmu_probe_pmuver() != ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF && !is_protected_kvm_enabled())
 		static_branch_enable(&kvm_arm_pmu_available);
 
 	return perf_register_guest_info_callbacks(&kvm_guest_cbs);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
index f33825c995cb..60f89bdbeebb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ int kvm_pmu_probe_pmuver(void)
 	struct perf_event_attr attr = { };
 	struct perf_event *event;
 	struct arm_pmu *pmu;
-	int pmuver = 0xf;
+	int pmuver = ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF;
 
 	/*
 	 * Create a dummy event that only counts user cycles. As we'll never
@@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ int kvm_pmu_probe_pmuver(void)
 	if (IS_ERR(event)) {
 		pr_err_once("kvm: pmu event creation failed %ld\n",
 			    PTR_ERR(event));
-		return 0xf;
+		return ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF;
 	}
 
 	if (event->pmu) {
@@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
 	if (!vcpu->kvm->arch.pmuver)
 		vcpu->kvm->arch.pmuver = kvm_pmu_probe_pmuver();
 
-	if (vcpu->kvm->arch.pmuver == 0xf)
+	if (vcpu->kvm->arch.pmuver == ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
 	switch (attr->attr) {
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

             reply	other threads:[~2021-08-10  5:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-10  5:06 Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2021-08-10 13:31 ` [PATCH] arm64/perf: Replace '0xf' instances with ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF Will Deacon
2021-08-10 15:01   ` Anshuman Khandual

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1628571998-13634-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).