From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A0EC4363D for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 23:03:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 068022396F for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 23:03:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="CpwtfBDR"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="fnWeMmJQ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 068022396F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:From:Subject:References:Mime-Version:Message-Id: In-Reply-To:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=zbzGvM1dORfgiwCpNeh+S/yeLITIoUQss83fODismls=; b=CpwtfBDRZ/EEE11aSftAO9vDi GoocNhZZsfuGwAH4652ZrZWeWPnOyH9xeKD7fBQzto1G/OsdbifDc4bSpiUwEq6aIRX+9T5I/D1+G PnNiiBhRncF1qGahgZD0iF5uusog0R7oIbieTt3c3quxF7EEqPTOy9Iuc9fmoz5/zm9HHMITwDI+9 hzAv1/aw7aqiPF3I2Wqf3GWNcZG6UzaWhiqEQlxVbTltedAeKISNmrzi+uw8aqbVfSX1wLFwoms9e vtvEocOplVbqh1A66YmzwooSsVyCfpVH2HizOU8Hz/4n2eq/te+onzh2nq9ULfxqle2OhXeuJMQ8z iJJsOVhJw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kLaEw-0006WH-TG; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 23:01:27 +0000 Received: from mail-wr1-x44a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::44a]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kLa5m-0002Rl-3s for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 22:51:59 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-x44a.google.com with SMTP id w7so297806wrp.2 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 15:51:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject :from:to:cc; bh=DwY0XJ+mNp8uQtCgvLTc+GHO/ICbiZZuKiMqQmp5BSw=; b=fnWeMmJQLU3oHbLupDqgsMX/MJf3lZiB+lnG53XCUujmVOZcdrJp66+A9acbYwSThA mc164WQR4vPd2o3XvQV+uU78vuCdjqIMWpWVaaN5lVZA8MRAmKWW9MmsmBCh7WuxTQst abxJ1iVQhRwt+7CJgK9aYS+wKveaF0X72gmUNVykFvalcDAAIHrgnlQqr0xtuIQ1rWlG DKrWHeceS4xeqsWvi9VmEQoIZTsf4oR0a/OT4P/ILTuPZgcAAyGibhSueg8aTDLFexfJ TozxDIGw1y402M4caZQ5Sf4ifcNVIlbJ3JEYGQQA50hfZkQ9zVcwlokslQf7wadlAe+f nT7Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=DwY0XJ+mNp8uQtCgvLTc+GHO/ICbiZZuKiMqQmp5BSw=; b=mjHBeUh/oyWLroJQHmzVH8oaeePYHi7lbqdFMPDjACFhqDRWEqEN8DfrRQPsUqk1lt oBn8e9H/kWQWymgbIYBNDcwed1k0wg1aArWxOpsBoTuQAZqlaZvqNmct8gszB0g59/Bi 1LWzGsuxSxFZQyHq1G5mFajqrnr15tDlVzVmXsxiUaRLbFNkexkEaDVi2pLN7J/Mkdr0 9DHaOvGoR6GDRINcboBvXreCnwg8nbHaeY1L9gewwYVAjRM8xpPBFBAfHjR/bnrWdwU+ DFz8MqyeB3wt52H8Ns7wB5ZStaECc7DqRDbYVC/iByn4+oMkxsAtdW0/WEFNJ/K8PZlg 6zQA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533XX7YSaxDWFWbeD7Ld1NgyHMwx2J4anuTTSSf/JJQZHAVC7N1a MMkvHtmcJcGPfwSRNM1LU/K3mnPDUBlxqorg X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxBwcfk6F/JbL9VArMBFeE13MUrJlwy29q40146eCD6EncjS3WbBk4yofyDTqASykbTAZtetSw5cOH2ohnN X-Received: from andreyknvl3.muc.corp.google.com ([2a00:79e0:15:13:7220:84ff:fe09:7e9d]) (user=andreyknvl job=sendgmr) by 2002:a7b:c14f:: with SMTP id z15mr113wmi.1.1600987914792; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 15:51:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 00:50:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <17ec8af55dc0a4d3ade679feb0858f0df4c80d27.1600987622.git.andreyknvl@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.28.0.681.g6f77f65b4e-goog Subject: [PATCH v3 26/39] arm64: mte: Add in-kernel tag fault handler From: Andrey Konovalov To: Dmitry Vyukov , Vincenzo Frascino , Catalin Marinas , kasan-dev@googlegroups.com X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200924_185158_265068_8701E80A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 22.67 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Marco Elver , Elena Petrova , Andrey Konovalov , Kevin Brodsky , Will Deacon , Branislav Rankov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Alexander Potapenko , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Andrey Ryabinin , Andrew Morton , Evgenii Stepanov Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: Vincenzo Frascino Add the implementation of the in-kernel fault handler. When a tag fault happens on a kernel address: * MTE is disabled on the current CPU, * the execution continues. When a tag fault happens on a user address: * the kernel executes do_bad_area() and panics. The tag fault handler for kernel addresses is currently empty and will be filled in by a future commit. Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino Co-developed-by: Andrey Konovalov Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov --- Change-Id: I9b8aa79567f7c45f4d6a1290efcf34567e620717 --- arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h index 991dd5f031e4..c7fff8daf2a7 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h @@ -200,13 +200,36 @@ do { \ CONFIG_ARM64_PAN)); \ } while (0) +/* + * The Tag Check Flag (TCF) mode for MTE is per EL, hence TCF0 + * affects EL0 and TCF affects EL1 irrespective of which TTBR is + * used. + * The kernel accesses TTBR0 usually with LDTR/STTR instructions + * when UAO is available, so these would act as EL0 accesses using + * TCF0. + * However futex.h code uses exclusives which would be executed as + * EL1, this can potentially cause a tag check fault even if the + * user disables TCF0. + * + * To address the problem we set the PSTATE.TCO bit in uaccess_enable() + * and reset it in uaccess_disable(). + * + * The Tag check override (TCO) bit disables temporarily the tag checking + * preventing the issue. + */ static inline void uaccess_disable(void) { + asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_TCO(0), + ARM64_MTE, CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS)); + __uaccess_disable(ARM64_HAS_PAN); } static inline void uaccess_enable(void) { + asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_TCO(1), + ARM64_MTE, CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS)); + __uaccess_enable(ARM64_HAS_PAN); } diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c index a3bd189602df..d110f382dacf 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -294,6 +295,11 @@ static void die_kernel_fault(const char *msg, unsigned long addr, do_exit(SIGKILL); } +static void report_tag_fault(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, + struct pt_regs *regs) +{ +} + static void __do_kernel_fault(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs) { @@ -641,10 +647,40 @@ static int do_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs) return 0; } +static void do_tag_recovery(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, + struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + static bool reported = false; + + if (!READ_ONCE(reported)) { + report_tag_fault(addr, esr, regs); + WRITE_ONCE(reported, true); + } + + /* + * Disable MTE Tag Checking on the local CPU for the current EL. + * It will be done lazily on the other CPUs when they will hit a + * tag fault. + */ + sysreg_clear_set(sctlr_el1, SCTLR_ELx_TCF_MASK, SCTLR_ELx_TCF_NONE); + isb(); +} + + static int do_tag_check_fault(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs) { - do_bad_area(addr, esr, regs); + /* + * The tag check fault (TCF) is per EL, hence TCF0 affects + * EL0 and TCF affects EL1. + * TTBR0 address belong by convention to EL0 hence to correctly + * discriminate we use the is_ttbr0_addr() macro. + */ + if (is_ttbr0_addr(addr)) + do_bad_area(addr, esr, regs); + else + do_tag_recovery(addr, esr, regs); + return 0; } -- 2.28.0.681.g6f77f65b4e-goog _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel