From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51492C31E4B for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 20:43:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DB3A2084D for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 20:43:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="s5VGEiZw"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="ftuQRUKp" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1DB3A2084D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=6OjSW0gg35IJlOWpFImN3mAI0i5e4rYuDpd62gTVUt4=; b=s5VGEiZwAojhca cXwVjibjfi9E6V8hPCf1bv3cwoKy8XaeU+z8+s/INVXTnN0C6awNokdqKq7z1fH1mGHVGh9o+lJHB mDBfyBIaCm8T67UgrWFO8keKhhbB8UjKxKXLEvzSa1WheBscSM7mzGjE0tDd+uxVj54x7r1d9o4CG q7Zrpwuhi6E29PgrkXPuPgwvcjOn9W0ErMfgIaqNYnGaUQT+7gQpdcQbB9sTUSy258WmBOo7DdZuQ Ui0nbp5p4fHTrpa4fx3TZW10u49FWuYUyhaIak3mTHyupaOZzRLn4UzeB9ymRQ6LWgGgmViTtSqeV LHCDlMUOmL4DJZhu1uuw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hbt3A-000348-1r; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 20:43:52 +0000 Received: from mail-wr1-x442.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::442]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hbt0h-0000fW-4N for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 20:41:22 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-x442.google.com with SMTP id v14so3843778wrr.4 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:41:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PhBFLtR+RLSKJI14k4b+jQmHTO5RvF7MzDB1Qhshvx8=; b=ftuQRUKpikD7n5QznlRZZbq7usgvYFQ416m1PrvUhUF538CYvlq/QK6jyoYtoNnWsw MRwyIFIyN0Y3TuLyMhcHl7ddX/Mr317fJl81I9DIRoQyMAvqv2koXhg8KvPaCKamqcP2 aBYfT6gFSlBiErpkn2WxIEkWE9u61fa/Xj1JuQTCUumr5kg/c6CGk8jB2/7+H6lm0KSq gFzbDPjsWUmYvWO0TIAQB8z0lPZVQidOZewc3aC9N4zNbROYecw6BYG1XeOKhslZK3n8 GzEZHoPZE/6oImTu6Wv8IXjBPv3PFREb9+AN/jYPurfug4+5/OSaN1zaqgC/jCFYMZBs /5kA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PhBFLtR+RLSKJI14k4b+jQmHTO5RvF7MzDB1Qhshvx8=; b=o9USWIlE7qhwWwFM6Eu2aNsGOOVbgla5LRdlxlwi+ea8hLHL99Gcs++qtTSQYEmtMu m1T+66NgHkO93CGYtR9wMFhLkM6quk6MWuocX2/Sts3x9gaR90GgCOLQ8JzrQ6t6uJJ5 OHqfWoj64DBiYq8PV9P9T7mzl+3HajBEYbQrUWZF6YiAb3zWaSVgCOwvTRvnwCUo8TQH 9UwcEhvNV7vy4oMs+/nmKU/z4Lbo661GxQAvuSIyLXRrrzRN2CfXEQ2DEhkeXFVi9Uut Nv7gQcIGn1l/MikacyRmrRGx2E98cTaoO4UJ+2AWaNTFB05QLphhGHLnbJYyrHqtf1Kd aEoA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWHn6k9ik6kp10JgfYE5Njufv2yHNMHUiZV3OGRsy3PKVjbmRPO RPJcv/Jnb5Lm4JaBkt6UdrQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqySesIUR8LqjdHWEANs0GRdseUo+3jR3YN1YK8cIoLD77upTGb9emt8vq0KuipvKZJ52rYjqA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e84a:: with SMTP id d10mr1131305wrn.316.1560544876719; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:41:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian64.daheim (pD9E29824.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [217.226.152.36]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v24sm3041197wmj.26.2019.06.14.13.41.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:41:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.daheim ([127.0.0.1] helo=debian64.localnet) by debian64.daheim with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hbt0d-0008KE-8s; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 22:41:15 +0200 From: Christian Lamparter To: Sricharan R Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] arm64: dts: Add ipq6018 SoC and CP01 board support Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 22:41:15 +0200 Message-ID: <1981742.H2rzviYcjI@debian64> In-Reply-To: <1a00e8c8-d07c-3b02-8ea5-6d5f3e2c7b1a@codeaurora.org> References: <1559754961-26783-1-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org> <4056907.DrFocau5Ix@debian64> <1a00e8c8-d07c-3b02-8ea5-6d5f3e2c7b1a@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190614_134119_237943_39B091B5 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 26.51 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree , Stephen Boyd , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij , agross@kernel.org, linux-kernel , =?utf-8?B?0J/QsNCy0LXQuw==?= , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Rob Herring , linux-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wednesday, June 12, 2019 11:48:48 AM CEST Sricharan R wrote: > Hi Christian, > > On 6/10/2019 5:45 PM, Christian Lamparter wrote: > > On Monday, June 10, 2019 12:09:56 PM CEST Sricharan R wrote: > >> Hi Christian, > >> > >> On 6/6/2019 2:11 AM, Christian Lamparter wrote: > >>> On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 7:16 PM Sricharan R wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Add initial device tree support for the Qualcomm IPQ6018 SoC and > >>>> CP01 evaluation board. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R > >>>> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu > >>>> --- /dev/null > >>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi > >>>> > >>>> + clocks { > >>>> + sleep_clk: sleep_clk { > >>>> + compatible = "fixed-clock"; > >>>> + clock-frequency = <32000>; > >>>> + #clock-cells = <0>; > >>>> + }; > >>>> + > >>> Recently-ish, we ran into an issue with the clock-frequency of the sleep_clk > >>> on older IPQ40XX (and IPQ806x) on the OpenWrt Github and ML. > >>> From what I know, the external "32KHz" crystals have 32768 Hz, but the QSDK > >>> declares them at 32000 Hz. Since you probably have access to the BOM and > >>> datasheets. Can you please confirm what's the real clock frequency for > >>> the IPQ6018. > >>> (And maybe also for the sleep_clk of the IPQ4018 as well?). > >>> > >> > >> What exactly is the issue that you faced ? > >> Looking in to the docs, it is <32000> only on ipq6018 and ipq40xx as well. > > > > We need just a confirmation. > > > > Then again, Currently the qcom-ipq4019.dtsi is using 32768 Hz. > > > > | sleep_clk: sleep_clk { > > | compatible = "fixed-clock"; > > | clock-frequency = <32768>; > > | #clock-cells = <0>; > > | }; > > > > > > > > Which makes sense, because all previous Qualcomm Atheros MIPS and the > > future IPQ8072 SoCs have been either using or deriving a 32768 Hz clock. > > > > For example: The AR9344 derives the clock from the 25MHz/40MHz external > > oscillator. This is explained in "8.16.9 Derived RTC Clock (DERIVED_RTC_CLK)". > > Which mentions that the "32KHz" clock interval is 30.5 usec / 30.48 usec > > depending whenever the external reference crystal has 40MHz or 25MHz. > > (1/30.5usec = 32.7868852 kilohertz!). The QCA9558 datasheet says the same > > in "10.19.11 Derived RTC Clock". > > > > For IPQ8072: I point to the post by Sven Eckelmann on the OpenWrt ML: > > > > "I was only able to verify for IPQ8072 that it had a 32.768 KHz > > sleep clock." > > > > So this is pretty much "why there is an issue", it's confusing. > > Is possible can you please look if there are (fixed) divisors values > > listed in the documentation or the registers and bits that the values > > are stored in? Because then we could just calculate it. > > > > Really sorry for the confusion. So looking little more, SLEEP_CLK is derived > from an external 38.4MHZ crystal, it is 32.768 KHZ. That's really valuable information to have. Thank you! > Somehow the clk freq plan etc seems to mention them only as .032 MHZ and misses > out. That means i will correct the patch for 32768 and probably the > ipq8074.dtsi as well Ok, there's one more issue that Paul found (at least with the IPQ4019), https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1099482 it seems that the "sleep_clk" node in the qcom-ipq4019.dtsi is not used by the gcc-ipq4019.c clk driver. this causes both wifi rtc_clks and the usb sleep clks to dangle in the /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary (from a RT-AC58U) clock enable_cnt prepare_cnt rate accuracy phase ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- xo 9 9 48000000 0 0 [...] sleep_clk 1 1 32768 0 0 gcc_wcss5g_rtc_clk 1 1 0 0 0 gcc_wcss2g_rtc_clk 1 1 0 0 0 gcc_usb3_sleep_clk 1 1 0 0 0 gcc_usb2_sleep_clk 1 1 0 0 0 with his patch the /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary looks "better" (something like this:) clock enable_cnt prepare_cnt rate accuracy phase ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- xo 9 9 48000000 0 0 [...] gcc_sleep_clk_src 5 5 32000 0 0 gcc_wcss5g_rtc_clk 1 1 32000 0 0 gcc_wcss2g_rtc_clk 1 1 32000 0 0 gcc_usb3_sleep_clk 1 1 32000 0 0 gcc_usb2_sleep_clk 1 1 32000 0 0 but judging from your comment "SLEEP_CLK is derived from an external 38.4MHZ crystal" the gcc_sleep_clk_src / sleep_clk should have xo as the parent. so the ideal output should be: clock enable_cnt prepare_cnt rate accuracy phase ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- xo 10 10 48000000 0 0 [...] gcc_sleep_clk 5 5 32768 0 0 gcc_wcss5g_rtc_clk 1 1 32768 0 0 gcc_wcss2g_rtc_clk 1 1 32768 0 0 gcc_usb3_sleep_clk 1 1 32768 0 0 gcc_usb2_sleep_clk 1 1 32768 0 0 or am I missing/skipping over something important? Regards, Christian _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel