* Re: [PATCH -next] firmware: ti_sci: remove set but not used variable 'dev'
2019-06-14 15:44 [PATCH -next] firmware: ti_sci: remove set but not used variable 'dev' YueHaibing
@ 2019-06-14 16:26 ` Suman Anna
2019-06-15 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 " YueHaibing
2019-06-15 12:50 ` [PATCH v3 -next] firmware: ti_sci: Fix gcc unused-but-set-variable warning YueHaibing
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Suman Anna @ 2019-06-14 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: YueHaibing, nm, t-kristo, ssantosh, santosh.shilimkar
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel
On 6/14/19 10:44 AM, YueHaibing wrote:
> Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning:
>
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_ring_config:
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2035:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config:
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2104:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg:
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2287:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg:
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2357:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
Thanks for the fix.
>
> It is never used since commit 1e407f337f40 ("firmware:
> ti_sci: Add support for processor control")
Warnings are actually introduced in commit 68608b5e5063 ("firmware:
ti_sci: Add resource management APIs for ringacc, psi-l and udma").
While this patch fixes the warnings as well, I suggest to replace the
dev_dbg/dev_err traces in these functions to use the dev variable
instead of info->dev, to be consistent with the usage in the rest of the
file.
regards
Suman
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c | 8 --------
> 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
> index 86b2727..8c1a961 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
> @@ -2032,14 +2032,12 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
> struct ti_sci_msg_hdr *resp;
> struct ti_sci_xfer *xfer;
> struct ti_sci_info *info;
> - struct device *dev;
> int ret = 0;
>
> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(handle))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> info = handle_to_ti_sci_info(handle);
> - dev = info->dev;
>
> xfer = ti_sci_get_one_xfer(info, TI_SCI_MSG_RM_RING_CFG,
> TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED,
> @@ -2101,14 +2099,12 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
> struct ti_sci_msg_rm_ring_get_cfg_req *req;
> struct ti_sci_xfer *xfer;
> struct ti_sci_info *info;
> - struct device *dev;
> int ret = 0;
>
> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(handle))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> info = handle_to_ti_sci_info(handle);
> - dev = info->dev;
>
> xfer = ti_sci_get_one_xfer(info, TI_SCI_MSG_RM_RING_GET_CFG,
> TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED,
> @@ -2284,14 +2280,12 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
> struct ti_sci_msg_hdr *resp;
> struct ti_sci_xfer *xfer;
> struct ti_sci_info *info;
> - struct device *dev;
> int ret = 0;
>
> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(handle))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> info = handle_to_ti_sci_info(handle);
> - dev = info->dev;
>
> xfer = ti_sci_get_one_xfer(info, TISCI_MSG_RM_UDMAP_TX_CH_CFG,
> TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED,
> @@ -2354,14 +2348,12 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
> struct ti_sci_msg_hdr *resp;
> struct ti_sci_xfer *xfer;
> struct ti_sci_info *info;
> - struct device *dev;
> int ret = 0;
>
> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(handle))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> info = handle_to_ti_sci_info(handle);
> - dev = info->dev;
>
> xfer = ti_sci_get_one_xfer(info, TISCI_MSG_RM_UDMAP_RX_CH_CFG,
> TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED,
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 -next] firmware: ti_sci: remove set but not used variable 'dev'
2019-06-14 15:44 [PATCH -next] firmware: ti_sci: remove set but not used variable 'dev' YueHaibing
2019-06-14 16:26 ` Suman Anna
@ 2019-06-15 12:38 ` YueHaibing
2019-06-15 12:46 ` Yuehaibing
2019-06-15 12:50 ` [PATCH v3 -next] firmware: ti_sci: Fix gcc unused-but-set-variable warning YueHaibing
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: YueHaibing @ 2019-06-15 12:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nm, t-kristo, ssantosh, s-anna, santosh.shilimkar
Cc: YueHaibing, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel
Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning:
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_ring_config:
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2035:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config:
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2104:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg:
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2287:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg:
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2357:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
Use the 'dev' variable instead of 'info->dev' to fix this.
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
---
v2: use the 'dev' variable as Suman Anna's suggestion
---
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
index 86b2727..c8da6e2 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
@@ -2046,7 +2046,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
- dev_err(info->dev, "RM_RA:Message config failed(%d)\n", ret);
+ dev_err(dev, "RM_RA:Message config failed(%d)\n", ret);
return ret;
}
req = (struct ti_sci_msg_rm_ring_cfg_req *)xfer->xfer_buf;
@@ -2062,7 +2062,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
ret = ti_sci_do_xfer(info, xfer);
if (ret) {
- dev_err(info->dev, "RM_RA:Mbox config send fail %d\n", ret);
+ dev_err(dev, "RM_RA:Mbox config send fail %d\n", ret);
goto fail;
}
@@ -2071,7 +2071,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
fail:
ti_sci_put_one_xfer(&info->minfo, xfer);
- dev_dbg(info->dev, "RM_RA:config ring %u ret:%d\n", index, ret);
+ dev_dbg(dev, "RM_RA:config ring %u ret:%d\n", index, ret);
return ret;
}
@@ -2115,7 +2115,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
- dev_err(info->dev,
+ dev_err(dev,
"RM_RA:Message get config failed(%d)\n", ret);
return ret;
}
@@ -2125,7 +2125,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
ret = ti_sci_do_xfer(info, xfer);
if (ret) {
- dev_err(info->dev, "RM_RA:Mbox get config send fail %d\n", ret);
+ dev_err(dev, "RM_RA:Mbox get config send fail %d\n", ret);
goto fail;
}
@@ -2150,7 +2150,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
fail:
ti_sci_put_one_xfer(&info->minfo, xfer);
- dev_dbg(info->dev, "RM_RA:get config ring %u ret:%d\n", index, ret);
+ dev_dbg(dev, "RM_RA:get config ring %u ret:%d\n", index, ret);
return ret;
}
@@ -2298,7 +2298,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
- dev_err(info->dev, "Message TX_CH_CFG alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
+ dev_err(dev, "Message TX_CH_CFG alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
return ret;
}
req = (struct ti_sci_msg_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg_req *)xfer->xfer_buf;
@@ -2323,7 +2323,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
ret = ti_sci_do_xfer(info, xfer);
if (ret) {
- dev_err(info->dev, "Mbox send TX_CH_CFG fail %d\n", ret);
+ dev_err(dev, "Mbox send TX_CH_CFG fail %d\n", ret);
goto fail;
}
@@ -2332,7 +2332,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
fail:
ti_sci_put_one_xfer(&info->minfo, xfer);
- dev_dbg(info->dev, "TX_CH_CFG: chn %u ret:%u\n", params->index, ret);
+ dev_dbg(dev, "TX_CH_CFG: chn %u ret:%u\n", params->index, ret);
return ret;
}
@@ -2368,7 +2368,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
- dev_err(info->dev, "Message RX_CH_CFG alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
+ dev_err(dev, "Message RX_CH_CFG alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
return ret;
}
req = (struct ti_sci_msg_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg_req *)xfer->xfer_buf;
@@ -2392,7 +2392,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
ret = ti_sci_do_xfer(info, xfer);
if (ret) {
- dev_err(info->dev, "Mbox send RX_CH_CFG fail %d\n", ret);
+ dev_err(dev, "Mbox send RX_CH_CFG fail %d\n", ret);
goto fail;
}
@@ -2401,7 +2401,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
fail:
ti_sci_put_one_xfer(&info->minfo, xfer);
- dev_dbg(info->dev, "RX_CH_CFG: chn %u ret:%d\n", params->index, ret);
+ dev_dbg(dev, "RX_CH_CFG: chn %u ret:%d\n", params->index, ret);
return ret;
}
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 -next] firmware: ti_sci: remove set but not used variable 'dev'
2019-06-15 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 " YueHaibing
@ 2019-06-15 12:46 ` Yuehaibing
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Yuehaibing @ 2019-06-15 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nm, t-kristo, ssantosh, s-anna, santosh.shilimkar
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel
Sorry, Pls ignore this, will fix the patch title
On 2019/6/15 20:38, YueHaibing wrote:
> Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning:
>
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_ring_config:
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2035:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config:
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2104:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg:
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2287:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg:
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2357:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>
> Use the 'dev' variable instead of 'info->dev' to fix this.
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
> ---
> v2: use the 'dev' variable as Suman Anna's suggestion
> ---
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
> index 86b2727..c8da6e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
> @@ -2046,7 +2046,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
> sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
> if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
> - dev_err(info->dev, "RM_RA:Message config failed(%d)\n", ret);
> + dev_err(dev, "RM_RA:Message config failed(%d)\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
> req = (struct ti_sci_msg_rm_ring_cfg_req *)xfer->xfer_buf;
> @@ -2062,7 +2062,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
>
> ret = ti_sci_do_xfer(info, xfer);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(info->dev, "RM_RA:Mbox config send fail %d\n", ret);
> + dev_err(dev, "RM_RA:Mbox config send fail %d\n", ret);
> goto fail;
> }
>
> @@ -2071,7 +2071,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
>
> fail:
> ti_sci_put_one_xfer(&info->minfo, xfer);
> - dev_dbg(info->dev, "RM_RA:config ring %u ret:%d\n", index, ret);
> + dev_dbg(dev, "RM_RA:config ring %u ret:%d\n", index, ret);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -2115,7 +2115,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
> sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
> if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
> - dev_err(info->dev,
> + dev_err(dev,
> "RM_RA:Message get config failed(%d)\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -2125,7 +2125,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
>
> ret = ti_sci_do_xfer(info, xfer);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(info->dev, "RM_RA:Mbox get config send fail %d\n", ret);
> + dev_err(dev, "RM_RA:Mbox get config send fail %d\n", ret);
> goto fail;
> }
>
> @@ -2150,7 +2150,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
>
> fail:
> ti_sci_put_one_xfer(&info->minfo, xfer);
> - dev_dbg(info->dev, "RM_RA:get config ring %u ret:%d\n", index, ret);
> + dev_dbg(dev, "RM_RA:get config ring %u ret:%d\n", index, ret);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -2298,7 +2298,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
> sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
> if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
> - dev_err(info->dev, "Message TX_CH_CFG alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
> + dev_err(dev, "Message TX_CH_CFG alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
> req = (struct ti_sci_msg_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg_req *)xfer->xfer_buf;
> @@ -2323,7 +2323,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
>
> ret = ti_sci_do_xfer(info, xfer);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(info->dev, "Mbox send TX_CH_CFG fail %d\n", ret);
> + dev_err(dev, "Mbox send TX_CH_CFG fail %d\n", ret);
> goto fail;
> }
>
> @@ -2332,7 +2332,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
>
> fail:
> ti_sci_put_one_xfer(&info->minfo, xfer);
> - dev_dbg(info->dev, "TX_CH_CFG: chn %u ret:%u\n", params->index, ret);
> + dev_dbg(dev, "TX_CH_CFG: chn %u ret:%u\n", params->index, ret);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -2368,7 +2368,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
> sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
> if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
> - dev_err(info->dev, "Message RX_CH_CFG alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
> + dev_err(dev, "Message RX_CH_CFG alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
> req = (struct ti_sci_msg_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg_req *)xfer->xfer_buf;
> @@ -2392,7 +2392,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
>
> ret = ti_sci_do_xfer(info, xfer);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(info->dev, "Mbox send RX_CH_CFG fail %d\n", ret);
> + dev_err(dev, "Mbox send RX_CH_CFG fail %d\n", ret);
> goto fail;
> }
>
> @@ -2401,7 +2401,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
>
> fail:
> ti_sci_put_one_xfer(&info->minfo, xfer);
> - dev_dbg(info->dev, "RX_CH_CFG: chn %u ret:%d\n", params->index, ret);
> + dev_dbg(dev, "RX_CH_CFG: chn %u ret:%d\n", params->index, ret);
> return ret;
> }
>
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 -next] firmware: ti_sci: Fix gcc unused-but-set-variable warning
2019-06-14 15:44 [PATCH -next] firmware: ti_sci: remove set but not used variable 'dev' YueHaibing
2019-06-14 16:26 ` Suman Anna
2019-06-15 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 " YueHaibing
@ 2019-06-15 12:50 ` YueHaibing
2019-06-17 18:41 ` Suman Anna
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: YueHaibing @ 2019-06-15 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nm, t-kristo, ssantosh, s-anna, santosh.shilimkar
Cc: YueHaibing, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel
Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning:
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_ring_config:
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2035:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config:
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2104:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg:
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2287:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg:
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2357:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
Use the 'dev' variable instead of info->dev to fix this.
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
---
v3: fix patch title
v2: use the 'dev' variable as Suman Anna's suggestion
---
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
index 86b2727..c8da6e2 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
@@ -2046,7 +2046,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
- dev_err(info->dev, "RM_RA:Message config failed(%d)\n", ret);
+ dev_err(dev, "RM_RA:Message config failed(%d)\n", ret);
return ret;
}
req = (struct ti_sci_msg_rm_ring_cfg_req *)xfer->xfer_buf;
@@ -2062,7 +2062,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
ret = ti_sci_do_xfer(info, xfer);
if (ret) {
- dev_err(info->dev, "RM_RA:Mbox config send fail %d\n", ret);
+ dev_err(dev, "RM_RA:Mbox config send fail %d\n", ret);
goto fail;
}
@@ -2071,7 +2071,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
fail:
ti_sci_put_one_xfer(&info->minfo, xfer);
- dev_dbg(info->dev, "RM_RA:config ring %u ret:%d\n", index, ret);
+ dev_dbg(dev, "RM_RA:config ring %u ret:%d\n", index, ret);
return ret;
}
@@ -2115,7 +2115,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
- dev_err(info->dev,
+ dev_err(dev,
"RM_RA:Message get config failed(%d)\n", ret);
return ret;
}
@@ -2125,7 +2125,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
ret = ti_sci_do_xfer(info, xfer);
if (ret) {
- dev_err(info->dev, "RM_RA:Mbox get config send fail %d\n", ret);
+ dev_err(dev, "RM_RA:Mbox get config send fail %d\n", ret);
goto fail;
}
@@ -2150,7 +2150,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
fail:
ti_sci_put_one_xfer(&info->minfo, xfer);
- dev_dbg(info->dev, "RM_RA:get config ring %u ret:%d\n", index, ret);
+ dev_dbg(dev, "RM_RA:get config ring %u ret:%d\n", index, ret);
return ret;
}
@@ -2298,7 +2298,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
- dev_err(info->dev, "Message TX_CH_CFG alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
+ dev_err(dev, "Message TX_CH_CFG alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
return ret;
}
req = (struct ti_sci_msg_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg_req *)xfer->xfer_buf;
@@ -2323,7 +2323,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
ret = ti_sci_do_xfer(info, xfer);
if (ret) {
- dev_err(info->dev, "Mbox send TX_CH_CFG fail %d\n", ret);
+ dev_err(dev, "Mbox send TX_CH_CFG fail %d\n", ret);
goto fail;
}
@@ -2332,7 +2332,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
fail:
ti_sci_put_one_xfer(&info->minfo, xfer);
- dev_dbg(info->dev, "TX_CH_CFG: chn %u ret:%u\n", params->index, ret);
+ dev_dbg(dev, "TX_CH_CFG: chn %u ret:%u\n", params->index, ret);
return ret;
}
@@ -2368,7 +2368,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
- dev_err(info->dev, "Message RX_CH_CFG alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
+ dev_err(dev, "Message RX_CH_CFG alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
return ret;
}
req = (struct ti_sci_msg_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg_req *)xfer->xfer_buf;
@@ -2392,7 +2392,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
ret = ti_sci_do_xfer(info, xfer);
if (ret) {
- dev_err(info->dev, "Mbox send RX_CH_CFG fail %d\n", ret);
+ dev_err(dev, "Mbox send RX_CH_CFG fail %d\n", ret);
goto fail;
}
@@ -2401,7 +2401,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
fail:
ti_sci_put_one_xfer(&info->minfo, xfer);
- dev_dbg(info->dev, "RX_CH_CFG: chn %u ret:%d\n", params->index, ret);
+ dev_dbg(dev, "RX_CH_CFG: chn %u ret:%d\n", params->index, ret);
return ret;
}
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3 -next] firmware: ti_sci: Fix gcc unused-but-set-variable warning
2019-06-15 12:50 ` [PATCH v3 -next] firmware: ti_sci: Fix gcc unused-but-set-variable warning YueHaibing
@ 2019-06-17 18:41 ` Suman Anna
2019-06-19 4:35 ` santosh.shilimkar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Suman Anna @ 2019-06-17 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: YueHaibing, nm, t-kristo, ssantosh, santosh.shilimkar
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel
On 6/15/19 7:50 AM, YueHaibing wrote:
> Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning:
>
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_ring_config:
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2035:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config:
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2104:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg:
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2287:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg:
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2357:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>
> Use the 'dev' variable instead of info->dev to fix this.
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Hi Santosh,
Can you pick up this patch, goes on top of your for_5.3/driver-soc branch?
regards
Suman
> ---
> v3: fix patch title
> v2: use the 'dev' variable as Suman Anna's suggestion
> ---
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
> index 86b2727..c8da6e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
> @@ -2046,7 +2046,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
> sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
> if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
> - dev_err(info->dev, "RM_RA:Message config failed(%d)\n", ret);
> + dev_err(dev, "RM_RA:Message config failed(%d)\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
> req = (struct ti_sci_msg_rm_ring_cfg_req *)xfer->xfer_buf;
> @@ -2062,7 +2062,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
>
> ret = ti_sci_do_xfer(info, xfer);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(info->dev, "RM_RA:Mbox config send fail %d\n", ret);
> + dev_err(dev, "RM_RA:Mbox config send fail %d\n", ret);
> goto fail;
> }
>
> @@ -2071,7 +2071,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
>
> fail:
> ti_sci_put_one_xfer(&info->minfo, xfer);
> - dev_dbg(info->dev, "RM_RA:config ring %u ret:%d\n", index, ret);
> + dev_dbg(dev, "RM_RA:config ring %u ret:%d\n", index, ret);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -2115,7 +2115,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
> sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
> if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
> - dev_err(info->dev,
> + dev_err(dev,
> "RM_RA:Message get config failed(%d)\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -2125,7 +2125,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
>
> ret = ti_sci_do_xfer(info, xfer);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(info->dev, "RM_RA:Mbox get config send fail %d\n", ret);
> + dev_err(dev, "RM_RA:Mbox get config send fail %d\n", ret);
> goto fail;
> }
>
> @@ -2150,7 +2150,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
>
> fail:
> ti_sci_put_one_xfer(&info->minfo, xfer);
> - dev_dbg(info->dev, "RM_RA:get config ring %u ret:%d\n", index, ret);
> + dev_dbg(dev, "RM_RA:get config ring %u ret:%d\n", index, ret);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -2298,7 +2298,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
> sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
> if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
> - dev_err(info->dev, "Message TX_CH_CFG alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
> + dev_err(dev, "Message TX_CH_CFG alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
> req = (struct ti_sci_msg_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg_req *)xfer->xfer_buf;
> @@ -2323,7 +2323,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
>
> ret = ti_sci_do_xfer(info, xfer);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(info->dev, "Mbox send TX_CH_CFG fail %d\n", ret);
> + dev_err(dev, "Mbox send TX_CH_CFG fail %d\n", ret);
> goto fail;
> }
>
> @@ -2332,7 +2332,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
>
> fail:
> ti_sci_put_one_xfer(&info->minfo, xfer);
> - dev_dbg(info->dev, "TX_CH_CFG: chn %u ret:%u\n", params->index, ret);
> + dev_dbg(dev, "TX_CH_CFG: chn %u ret:%u\n", params->index, ret);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -2368,7 +2368,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
> sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
> if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
> - dev_err(info->dev, "Message RX_CH_CFG alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
> + dev_err(dev, "Message RX_CH_CFG alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
> req = (struct ti_sci_msg_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg_req *)xfer->xfer_buf;
> @@ -2392,7 +2392,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
>
> ret = ti_sci_do_xfer(info, xfer);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(info->dev, "Mbox send RX_CH_CFG fail %d\n", ret);
> + dev_err(dev, "Mbox send RX_CH_CFG fail %d\n", ret);
> goto fail;
> }
>
> @@ -2401,7 +2401,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
>
> fail:
> ti_sci_put_one_xfer(&info->minfo, xfer);
> - dev_dbg(info->dev, "RX_CH_CFG: chn %u ret:%d\n", params->index, ret);
> + dev_dbg(dev, "RX_CH_CFG: chn %u ret:%d\n", params->index, ret);
> return ret;
> }
>
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3 -next] firmware: ti_sci: Fix gcc unused-but-set-variable warning
2019-06-17 18:41 ` Suman Anna
@ 2019-06-19 4:35 ` santosh.shilimkar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: santosh.shilimkar @ 2019-06-19 4:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Suman Anna, YueHaibing, nm, t-kristo, ssantosh
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel
On 6/17/19 11:41 AM, Suman Anna wrote:
> On 6/15/19 7:50 AM, YueHaibing wrote:
>> Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning:
>>
>> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_ring_config:
>> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2035:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config:
>> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2104:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg:
>> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2287:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg:
>> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2357:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>>
>> Use the 'dev' variable instead of info->dev to fix this.
>>
>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
>
> Acked-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
>
> Hi Santosh,
> Can you pick up this patch, goes on top of your for_5.3/driver-soc branch?
>
Applied.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread