From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ASoC: omap: convert per-board modules to platform drivers
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 10:41:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110909094156.GE6918@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110908235903.GA6370@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 04:59:04PM -0700, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 12:01:02AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 03:47:31PM -0700, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > What will happen for device tree is that there will be a device in the
> > > device tree for the ASoC board.
>
> > Sounds like you just solved the machine_is_xxx() problem in ASoC land too
> > there. If you're _already_ going for separate devices to describe the
> > ASoC stuff on the board, then there's no reason that couldn't have already
> > been done to eliminate the machine_is_xxx() usage in ASoC - rather than
> > complaining about machine_is_xxx() not being a very good solution.
>
> The problem is that someone has to manually go and add the device to
> every board that needs one and people find that tedious and slightly
> inelegant
Sheesh. So now you're arguing against your statement above? Please
stop wasting my time.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-09 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-08 17:34 [PATCH v2] ASoC: omap: convert per-board modules to platform drivers Mans Rullgard
2011-09-08 18:17 ` Jassi Brar
2011-09-08 18:18 ` Mark Brown
2011-09-08 18:35 ` Jassi Brar
2011-09-08 19:08 ` Mans Rullgard
2011-09-08 19:05 ` Mans Rullgard
2011-09-08 19:17 ` Jassi Brar
2011-09-08 19:26 ` Mans Rullgard
2011-09-08 20:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-08 22:29 ` Mark Brown
2011-09-08 22:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-08 22:47 ` Mark Brown
2011-09-08 23:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-08 23:59 ` Mark Brown
2011-09-09 8:48 ` Jassi Brar
2011-09-09 9:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2011-09-09 16:11 ` Mark Brown
2011-09-09 19:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-09 19:30 ` Mark Brown
2011-09-09 20:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-10 20:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-10 21:43 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110909094156.GE6918@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).