From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: simon.guinot@sequanux.org (Simon Guinot) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 11:59:05 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v3 0/9] refactoring for mask_cache In-Reply-To: <5149F48D.3030706@keymile.com> References: <1363277430-21325-1-git-send-email-holger.brunck@keymile.com> <1363615255-18200-1-git-send-email-gerlando.falauto@keymile.com> <20130319100352.GB2419@localhost> <20130319110620.GO13280@titan.lakedaemon.net> <51484793.5020102@keymile.com> <20130319114430.GP13280@titan.lakedaemon.net> <20130319115615.GR13280@titan.lakedaemon.net> <5149F48D.3030706@keymile.com> Message-ID: <20130321105900.GC16903@kw.sim.vm.gnt> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 06:40:29PM +0100, Gerlando Falauto wrote: > Hi, > > sorry about the delay (been busy with other stuff). > First of all thanks for your hints. I have some questions. > This is my first time, so please be gentle... :-) > > On 03/19/2013 12:56 PM, Jason Cooper wrote: > >On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 07:44:31AM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote: > >>Those commit IDs are going to change once LinusW (I presume) applies > >>them to his tree, so he'll have to edit each commit message to point the > >>the correct commit. > >> > >>LinusW, do you want me to handle this? > > > >Never mind, coffee underflow to /dev/brain. One drawback to mutt, can't > >view thread while typing messages... > > 1) I had no idea who LinusW is, I assume Linus Walleij who should be > the maintainer of linux-gpio. And linux-gpio should have nothing to > do with this discussion... so I should assume you never mentioned > him, right? > > 2) About the SOB part... most of this is inspired by Simon's > original (single) patch and Holger's reworking. Should they be given > credit or not? If yes, how? If I don't get an answer I would just > assume no and I'll take all the blame and credit all by myself. :-) Please drop all the SOBs with my name. Except for giving up a patch almost two years, I am not involved in this patch series development. I am quite sure there is no credit in that :) Thanks. Simon > > 3) Jason, did you mean you would pull it to > http://git.infradead.org/users/jcooper/linux.git? Shall I change the > SOB lines and resubmit? Or should I submit it somewhere else > instead? > > 4) About submitting to -stable, I guess it wouldn't make any sense > until it gets included upstream > (https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/ so > to speak). Is that right? > Or at least to jcooper's tree, through which it should eventually > make it mainline through a merge (therefore keeping its commit-id). > That right? > > I did read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt and what I > understand is that it would be enough to submit to > stable at vger.kernel.org only the last one, while providing a list of > > Cc: # 3.0.x: 123456 first patch > Cc: # 3.0.x: 123457 second patch > Cc: # 3.0.x: 123458 third patch > > using the mainstream (or jcooper's) commit IDs. > > I don't know whether I'd have to repeat that for each version (3.0 > will include only a subset of this series, while 3.7 and following > will need the whole nine yards, and what's in between... well, > something in between). > > Please let me know what to do. Again, it's my first time so please > be gentle. :-) > > Thanks again! > Gerlando > > >>If you prefer to take it: > >> > >>Acked-by: Jason Cooper > > > >for the plat-orion/gpio.c bits and if it helps, the gpio-mvebu.c bits. > > > >thx, > > > >Jason. > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: