From: peterz@infradead.org (Peter Zijlstra)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] seqlock: Use raw_ prefix instead of _no_lockdep
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 11:10:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140106101039.GD31570@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52C755AF.5030402@linaro.org>
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 04:28:31PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> On 01/02/2014 04:50 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 3:11 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote:
> >> Linus disliked the _no_lockdep() naming, so instead
> >> use the more-consistent raw_* prefix to the non-lockdep
> >> enabled seqcount methods.
> >>
> >> This also adds raw_ methods for the write operations
> >> as well, which will be utilized in a following patch.
> > Ack on this and on 2/2. I'm assuming I'll get them through the -tip
> > tree, which is where the problem came from. No?
>
> It seems Peter or Ingo are still on holiday. Hopefully they will be back
> on Monday to queue these.
Done! thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-06 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-31 10:37 v3.13-rc6+ regression (ARM board) Krzysztof Hałasa
2013-12-31 10:45 ` Willy Tarreau
2014-01-02 10:02 ` Krzysztof Hałasa
2014-01-02 10:14 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-01-02 12:07 ` Krzysztof Hałasa
2014-01-02 19:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-02 20:03 ` John Stultz
2014-01-02 20:30 ` John Stultz
2014-01-02 20:42 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-01-02 20:52 ` John Stultz
2014-01-02 20:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-02 21:34 ` John Stultz
2014-01-02 21:54 ` [PATCH] sched_clock: Disable seqlock lockdep usage in sched_clock John Stultz
2014-01-02 22:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-02 22:21 ` John Stultz
2014-01-02 23:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] seqlock: Use raw_ prefix instead of _no_lockdep John Stultz
2014-01-02 23:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched_clock: Disable seqlock lockdep usage in sched_clock John Stultz
2014-01-03 0:46 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-01-03 6:05 ` Krzysztof Hałasa
2014-01-03 0:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] seqlock: Use raw_ prefix instead of _no_lockdep Stephen Boyd
2014-01-03 0:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-04 0:28 ` John Stultz
2014-01-06 10:10 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-01-03 6:01 ` v3.13-rc6+ regression (ARM board) Krzysztof Hałasa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140106101039.GD31570@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).