From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: LW@KARO-electronics.de (Lothar =?UTF-8?B?V2HDn21hbm4=?=)
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:44:51 +0200
Subject: [PATCHv4 0/5] mtd: gpmi: make blockmark swapping optional
In-Reply-To: <1402579245-13377-1-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de>
References: <1402579245-13377-1-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de>
Message-ID: <20140626124451.6014fde3@ipc1.ka-ro>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi,

Lothar Wa?mann wrote:
> With a flash-based BBT there is no reason to move the Factory Bad
> Block Marker from the data area buffer (to where it is mapped by the
> GPMI NAND controller) to the OOB buffer. Thus, make this feature
> configurable via DT. This is required for the Ka-Ro electronics
> i.MX6 platforms.
> 
> Changes wrt. v2:
> - added a warning for i.MX28 to the binding documentation
> - fixed the gpmi_ecc_read_subpage() routine which turned on blockmark
>   swapping unconditionally
> - use !GPMI_IS_MX23() in place of this->swap_block_mark (which were
>   synonymous the original code) in gpmi_ecc_read_oob() and
>   gpmi_block_markbad()
> - make nand-on-flash-bbt a prerequisite for this feature
> 
> patch added:
> - add an additional option to turn of BB mark writing
> 
> Changes wrt. v3:
> - added two code cleanup patches
> - added a patch to turn of NAND_BBT_CREATE, if blockmark swapping is disabled
> 
> 
any comments on this patchset?


Lothar Wa?mann
-- 
___________________________________________________________

Ka-Ro electronics GmbH | Pascalstra?e 22 | D - 52076 Aachen
Phone: +49 2408 1402-0 | Fax: +49 2408 1402-10
Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Matthias Kaussen
Handelsregistereintrag: Amtsgericht Aachen, HRB 4996

www.karo-electronics.de | info at karo-electronics.de
___________________________________________________________