From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: balbi@ti.com (Felipe Balbi) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 08:55:30 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: l2c: squelch warning dump on power control setting In-Reply-To: <53BD34FD.5070005@ti.com> References: <20140707110249.GO28884@atomide.com> <53BA8983.3030803@ti.com> <20140707121512.GT3705@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20140707123925.GW28884@atomide.com> <20140707134008.GU3705@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20140707151024.GJ5582@saruman.home> <53BB7980.2060909@ti.com> <20140708082948.GE28884@atomide.com> <20140709092531.GK28884@atomide.com> <53BD34FD.5070005@ti.com> Message-ID: <20140709135530.GD973@saruman.home> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 05:56:37PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: > On Wednesday 09 July 2014 02:55 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Tony Lindgren [140708 01:32]: > >> * Sekhar Nori [140707 21:56]: > >>> On Monday 07 July 2014 08:40 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >>>> On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 02:40:08PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > >>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c > >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c > >>>>> @@ -732,7 +732,7 @@ static int l2c310_cpu_enable_flz(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long act, v > >>>>> > >>>>> static void __init l2c310_enable(void __iomem *base, u32 aux, unsigned num_lock) > >>>>> { > >>>>> - unsigned rev = readl_relaxed(base + L2X0_CACHE_ID) & L2X0_CACHE_ID_PART_MASK; > >>>>> + unsigned rev = readl_relaxed(base + L2X0_CACHE_ID) & L2X0_CACHE_ID_RTL_MASK; > >>>>> bool cortex_a9 = read_cpuid_part() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9; > >>>> > >>>> even with this change, l2c still tries to write to power control > >>>> register, at least on AM437x. Looking a little deeper here, AM437x > >>>> identifies itself as l2c PL310 r3p3, which should have power control > >>>> register, but aparentely there's no way to write that register. I'll > >>>> file a bug to our ROM team, but we will certainly need a way to > >>>> workaround this inside omap4-common.c > >>> > >>> Looks like we need both my patch as well as Russell's patch. I can > >>> respin my patch with the pr_info_once() dropped if it helps further > >>> reduce boot noise. > >> > >> In that case I'm fine with the original patch in this series. Russell, > >> got any better ideas? > > > > I guess no more comments. Took a look at the patch again, Sekhar, can > > you please update the description with what has been discovered in this > > thread and repost? > > How does the following sound: > > --- > AM437x has L2C-310 version r3p2 and ROM code on that device does not at least my SoC has r3p3 (cache ID 0x9), other than that, commit log looks good to my eyes. -- balbi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: