From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: javi.merino@arm.com (Javi Merino) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 11:05:52 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: tests: Providing cpufreq regression test In-Reply-To: <20140723121042.5b6f49e3@amdc2363> References: <1405678985-21677-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <1405926154-27214-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <20140723093824.5e51918f@amdc2363> <20140723121042.5b6f49e3@amdc2363> Message-ID: <20140724100551.GA2697@e104805> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:10:42AM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Hi Viresh, > > > On 23 July 2014 13:08, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > > Do you want to say that we have enough tests and we don't need > > > more ? > > > > No. We don't have any tests at all :) > > Then we should encourage as many developers as possible to share their > private tests with us. Linaro publishes their regression tests here: https://git.linaro.org/tools/pm-qa.git Description: https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Resources/TestSuite/PmQaSpecification#Cpufreq I have only used the thermal ones, I can't comment on the cpufreq tests. Cheers, Javi