From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: tj@kernel.org (Tejun Heo)
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:35:26 -0400
Subject: [PATCH v11 3/8] ata: libahci_platform: move port_map parameters
 into the AHCI structure
In-Reply-To: <20140730082038.GB29900@kwain>
References: <1406193450-17283-1-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>
 <1406193450-17283-4-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>
 <20140729144042.GD4791@htj.dyndns.org>
 <20140730082038.GB29900@kwain>
Message-ID: <20140730153526.GB23734@htj.dyndns.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hello,

On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:20:38AM +0200, Antoine T?nart wrote:
> How do you want me to send the series? There is two conflicts when
> applying to libata/for-3.17:
> - patch 4/8: it takes into account a patch not in libata/for-3.17 but
>   added before rc7. It should be better to first merge rc7, otherwise
>   some modifications won't make sense.
> - patch 6/8: "fsl,imx53-ahci" was removed from the documentation in
>   libata/for-3.17 but not in rc7. Resolving the conflict is really
>   simple.
> 
> I think it's better to apply the whole thing after merging rc7 into
> libata/for-3.17, because it will only have a really simple conflict to
> resolve.
> 
> Please tell me what do you prefer before I send the updated version.

Hmmm... does pulling in libata/for-3.16-fixes into libata/for-3.17
resolves the conflict?  If so, please send the patch on top of the
merged branch.  I wanna avoid pulling in -rc7 wholesale at this point.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun