From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bhelgaas@google.com (Bjorn Helgaas) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:17:16 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] PCI: mvebu: Fix uninitialized variable in mvebu_get_tgt_attr() In-Reply-To: References: <1407512045-26969-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <20140905174122.GD8080@google.com> <20140905202044.4c166a43@free-electrons.com> <5898856.RmRf87KNto@wuerfel> Message-ID: <20140916231716.GG5050@google.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 01:00:29PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Friday 05 September 2014 20:20:44 Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > >> Hum, I think I would actually prefer something like: > >> > >> if (DT_FLAGS_TO_TYPE(flags) == DT_TYPE_IO) > >> rtype = IORESOURCE_IO; > >> else if (DT_FLAGS_TO_TYPE(flags) == DT_TYPE_MEM32) > >> rtype = IORESOURCE_MEM; > >> + else > >> + continue; > >> > >> So that we're explicit with the fact that we only care about I/O and > >> MEM32 resource types. > > > > Agreed, that looks better than my patch as well. > > I like it better, too, but we still need the "range += rangesz" part, > so I don't think it will work. I suppose that could be moved to the > update expression of the "for" loop. Or, since we don't use "i" in > the loop at all, maybe we could do something like this: > > for (; range < rend; range += rangesz) Any more input on this? I don't think I've seen anything actually acked by Thomas or Jason.