From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: edubezval@gmail.com (Eduardo Valentin) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 08:34:00 -0400 Subject: [GIT PULL 2/2] Samsung fixes-2 for v4.0 In-Reply-To: <02cd01d057f6$ab1a8e40$014faac0$@kernel.org> References: <54F4B33E.3070803@kernel.org> <2064108.qlOP0oDx90@wuerfel> <02cd01d057f6$ab1a8e40$014faac0$@kernel.org> Message-ID: <20150305123358.GC25728@developer.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 07:16:53PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > + Eduardo > > Hi Arnd, > > > On Tuesday 03 March 2015 04:00:14 Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > Please pull Samsung tmu and hdmi regression fixes for v4.0 and I know > > > this is quite big for fixes but I couldn't handle this series for > > > previous merge window because of dependency with driver side...sorry for > > > that and please pull so that we could support them in v4.0 on exynos > > > platforms. > > > > What kind of dependency do you have there? It really should not be > > necessary to wait for driver changes, unless you do an incompatible > > DT binding change, which you should avoid. > > > For TMU patches, I've asked Eduardo to provide topic branch for > 'include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal_exynos.h' has been added via thermal tree > because if I can't apply the patch in Samsung tree for arm-soc, kernel build > breakage will be happened. But I couldn't get Eduardo's topic branch. Specifically, the developer, while migrating the driver to support DT and OF thermal, decided to create a header with constants. The header is used by DT files and the driver code. The header was the dependency. BR, Eduardo Valentin > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg41877.html > > > For HDMI patches, I thought the DT changes have a dependency with "drm/exynos: > add support for 'hdmi' clock" so waited for its applying then in drm tree. But > I couldn't send it to arm-soc after that... > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg42173.html > > > I asked about the situation (late DT changes?) when I sent a pull-request, then > I couldn't get a access my kernel.org because of biz. trip to China :( > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg42235.html > > > > I've pulled it into fixes, but won't forward it until I hear a > > good explanation. > > > As you know, basically I tried to make a clear branch for pull-request but in > that case, I couldn't find a solution. Sorry for the inconvenience. > > I hope v4.0 can support them properly. > > Thanks, > Kukjin > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: