From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pali.rohar@gmail.com (Pali =?utf-8?q?Roh=C3=A1r?=) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 21:54:27 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: DT: Add support for Revision In-Reply-To: <20150316195904.GN8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <201502271645.58765@pali> <20150316181023.GT5264@atomide.com> <20150316195904.GN8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <201503162154.27450@pali> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Monday 16 March 2015 20:59:04 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:10:26AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Russell King - ARM Linux [150316 > > 09:15]: > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 08:44:10AM -0700, Tony Lindgren > > > wrote: > > > > * Pavel Machek [150302 03:32]: > > > > > On Fri 2015-02-27 16:55:26, Pali Roh?r wrote: > > > > > > This patch adds support for DT "/revision" and > > > > > > convert ATAG_REVISION to DT. > > > > > > > > > > > > Pali Roh?r (2): > > > > > > arm: devtree: Set system_rev from DT revision > > > > > > arm: boot: convert ATAG_REVISION to DT revision > > > > > > field > > > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Pavel Machek > > > > > > > > Are these queued somewhere now? Sounds like this is the > > > > last pending issue for n900 to use legacy user space > > > > with current mainline kernels, so I'd like to get these > > > > in so we can get closer to making omap3 boot in device > > > > tree only mode. > > > > > > Not that I know of. As everyone is aware, patches need to > > > be in my patch system if they want me to apply them - > > > which would've been especially important as I was away > > > from kernel stuff for a week at the start of March (for > > > medical reasons) and I can't be expected to track the > > > status of stuff which is buried behind 1000+ extra mails. > > > > Pali, care to upload these two patches to Russell's patch > > tracking system if no other comments? > > If it's done soon, I should be able to send them to Linus > fairly quickly, since this problem I'm grappling with is > being seen by others who have better tools to be able to > investigate the problem (and hence they're in a better > position to investigate what's going on.) I have no idea how to upload those patches into tracking system. Right now I do not have enough time for testing any patches... Tony, or somebody else, if you have free time, can you upload (my) patches to that needed tracking system? -- Pali Roh?r pali.rohar at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: