From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown) Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 18:22:59 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 05/10] ARM: s3c64xx: enable sparse IRQ support In-Reply-To: <20150321163821.GE23705@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1425299763-4066822-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <1425299763-4066822-6-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <20150306174316.GA26692@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <6643361.dhtMagqMYZ@wuerfel> <20150318000234.GU28806@sirena.org.uk> <20150321163821.GE23705@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Message-ID: <20150321182259.GV2869@sirena.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 04:38:21PM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote: > So adding a bit of an offset into the PMIC with the fixed IRQ > base fixes the problem. Although I am not sure if it would be > better to move both PMICs onto a fixed IRQ base so there is no > chance of the clashing. Any thoughts? Yes, that sounds like the safest thing. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: