From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: s.hauer@pengutronix.de (Sascha Hauer)
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 12:49:14 +0100
Subject: [RFC] pinmux: group and function definitions in the device tree
In-Reply-To: <20150323100913.GJ9742@pengutronix.de>
References: <20150319153950.GC30114@odux.rfo.atmel.com>
 <20150319185637.GV4927@pengutronix.de>
 <20150320150609.GB32259@odux.rfo.atmel.com>
 <20150323064424.GD9742@pengutronix.de>
 <20150323090827.GD32259@odux.rfo.atmel.com>
 <20150323100913.GJ9742@pengutronix.de>
Message-ID: <20150323114914.GL9742@pengutronix.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:09:13AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> 
> This may be because the concept of groups doesn't most hardware.

I meant "doesn't match most hardware"

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |